1. Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premiere online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

Proposed USPAP Changes 2010-2011

Discussion in 'Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, USPAP' started by PropertyEconomics, Feb 22, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. PropertyEconomics

    PropertyEconomics Elite Member

    0
    Jun 19, 2007
    Professional Status:
    Certified General Appraiser
    State:
    New Mexico
  2. AnonApprsr

    AnonApprsr Elite Member

    0
    Jan 21, 2008
    Professional Status:
    Certified Residential Appraiser
    State:
    Massachusetts
    I'm still reading it, and so far I agree with the assignment change, but what's up with the signature change? I'll have to read that again.

    Blah, I'm going to have to read the whole thing and THEN come back here to comment but just another quick tidbit:

    They are adding/clarifying "three year period immediately preceding acceptance of the assignment," as far as the Subject's sale history goes. I'm pretty sure that doesn't make sense, and it should be from effective date, not the day before I got the assignment. Meh.

    Oh, and thanks PE, good look.
     
  3. Terrel L. Shields

    Terrel L. Shields Elite Member
    Gold Supporting Member

    415
    May 2, 2002
    Professional Status:
    Certified General Appraiser
    State:
    Arkansas
    That's idiotic...I have parcels for trusts that I appraise ANNUALLY. I've appraised properties up to 4 or 5 times over my career. So what? The 6 mo. rule was no big deal. It's intention was to identify appraisers who might revisit a property and give a different value in a short time frame...and it would mean a "comp check" would have to be disclosed. But 3 years? It will be used by lenders to say, "Since you've been there before, we get a discounted price, don't we?"

    And
    90% of those issues cannot be determined until you are well into the assignment. A lic. appraiser may find the property they thought was worth less than $250,000 was in fact going to appraise for $260,000...You are basically done with the report by the time you can tell that.

    The jurisdictional exception does appear to be clearer. I have no idea the purpose of the "signature" changes or why signature has seemed to be such a big deal for so long.
     
  4. PropertyEconomics

    PropertyEconomics Elite Member

    0
    Jun 19, 2007
    Professional Status:
    Certified General Appraiser
    State:
    New Mexico
    Terrel .. Im not even so sure that disclosure of appraising the property during the prior three years is not a violation of confidentiality ... I think that is conflicting with what USPAP says in the Ethics Provision.
     
  5. Carnivore

    Carnivore Elite Member

    0
    Jan 15, 2002
    Professional Status:
    Certified Residential Appraiser
    State:
    North Carolina
    My guess is becasue of all the report altering from the local yokel appraisers office with a trainee all the way up the ladder to companies like Eape and F_C and to big box lenders.

    A big push right now is web based form filling and providing your signature to the web based who-ever.

    I actually did not see a real need for changes to USPAP with exception to the confidentiality rule.

    JE is JE, if some dont understand it then maybe those some should seek a professional help.

    PE, I think your onto something in regards to confidentiality. The ASB is just interfering again in business, IMO. Seriously what standard does this strengthen?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page