Real Estate Appraisal Forum

appraisersforum.com logo
The Premiere Online Community for Real Estate Appraisers!
 Fastest Way to Find a Real Estate Appraiser Enter Zip Code:
 
 
Go Back   Appraisers Forum > Real Estate Appraisal Forums > Urgent - Help Needed
Register Help Our Rules Calendar Archives Mark Forums Read


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 03-13-2006, 02:57 PM
Timothy Fierek Timothy Fierek is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Wisconsin
State: Wisconsin
Professional Status: Licensed Appraiser
Posts: 169
Default Cost Approach - Reproduction or Replacement

When the cost approach is required, I run the Marshall and Swift Residential Cost Estimator.
Nearly everyone that I do I use Replacement Cost New.
Am currently working on a review for which the cost approach was completed Reproduction Cost New.
The appraiser does not seem to have any comprehension of the cost approach at all, with what appears to be made up cost figures.
Shouldn't the Reproduction only be used for unique or older properties for which the current building equivalent is not similar?
Thanks for any feedback.
Sponsored Links

  #2  
Old 03-13-2006, 03:02 PM
Robert Dunkle's Avatar
Robert Dunkle Robert Dunkle is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Skiatook, Oklahoma
State: Oklahoma
Professional Status: Certified General Appraiser
Posts: 1,404
Default

The reproduction cost can be used on any age property that you can reproduce. I NEVER use reproduction cost because that indicates that you have analyzed every facet of the building and have figured cost to exactly reproduce that building. My market and clients are more interested in replacement cost.

I would agree that the original appraiser probably didn't know how to do a Cost Approach, or, they could have just hit the wrong box.
  #3  
Old 03-14-2006, 02:26 AM
bart nathan bart nathan is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
State: California
Professional Status: Certified Residential Appraiser
Posts: 676
Default

I usually mark the reproduction box. I use the replacement cost figures but my software automatically plugs in the depreciation figure taken from the effective age of the house (WINTOTAL). Maybe I should start to check replacement cost and delete the depreciation figure? If you use the replacement approach there should be no depreciation figure taken out correct?
  #4  
Old 03-14-2006, 08:45 AM
Timothy Fierek Timothy Fierek is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Wisconsin
State: Wisconsin
Professional Status: Licensed Appraiser
Posts: 169
Default

Depreciation either way should be calculated, whether or not it is reproduction or replacement.
Look in Marshall and Swift at their depreciation tables.
I would not rely on the WinTotal program. Most of what I see is numbers pulled from air and plugged into Wintotal. Most appraisers seem to back into the cost approach in order to support their market approach.
  #5  
Old 03-14-2006, 09:00 AM
xm72mhd xm72mhd is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
State: Florida
Professional Status: General Public
Posts: 5,224
Default

For those of you who do reproduction cost approaches. I have been looking for a reliable source of reproduction cost figures and can't find one. Actually there isn't much demand for it, but I'm considering moving into a niche in historical homes and I have no ability to calculate what it would cost to reproduce a 1900 Victorian 3 story mansion.
  #6  
Old 03-14-2006, 09:14 AM
Brad Ellis Brad Ellis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
State: California
Professional Status: Certified Residential Appraiser
Posts: 2,551
Default

Edd,

Appraising historical homes is a great niche- been in that for years and teach it.

However, there will not really be a need for reproduction cost. In the first place, if the nature of the historical stature of the home relates to the improvements, the cost approach is not relevant since you could not reproduce the home with all the historical content. What I mean here is that, if the historical component is due to design by a famous dead architect, or because G. Washington slept there, etc. such content cannot be reproduced.

So, if that home were destroyed it could not be reproduced at all.

And, remember, this is coming from a cost approach believer! It is one of those times when I do not use it.

If the historical nature of the home is due to its location, such as being the gateway to an original toll road (we had them before cars), then the improvements themselves are far less important and replacement cost could be used, if you like.

That said, IF you find a way to get the reproduction costs that are at all reliabel, please do let me know. I'd love that data. At the same time, when I think about all the stuff that has been forgotten, it does bother me a bit.

When we renovated the Statue of Liberty, the flame had to have a new cost of gold leaf. There was only one old guy who knew how to do that, and part of his contract was to train two more guys in the art. If the original guy still lives there are now 3 on the planet!

Good luck, have fun, and go forth and do good.

Brad
  #7  
Old 03-14-2006, 09:37 AM
Otis Key's Avatar
Otis Key Otis Key is offline
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Mile High
State: New Mexico
Professional Status: Certified Residential Appraiser
Posts: 15,970
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bart nathan
I usually mark the reproduction box. I use the replacement cost figures but my software automatically plugs in the depreciation figure taken from the effective age of the house (WINTOTAL). Maybe I should start to check replacement cost and delete the depreciation figure? If you use the replacement approach there should be no depreciation figure taken out correct?
If you lock the REL space with nothing showing there then you can override the depreciation calculations and input them manually.
Sponsored Links

Closed Thread


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump




Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
     Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at AppraiserSites.com

Fastest Way to Find a Real Estate Appraiser Enter Zip Code:
Partner Sites:
AppraiserUSA.com - National Appraiser Directory AllDomainsUSA.com - Domain Name Registration
DeadbeatListings.com - Deadbeat ListingsAppraiserSites.com - Web Hosting for the Professional Real Estate Appraiser
Find FHA Appraisers - FHA Appraiser Search Commercial Appraisers - Commercial Appraiser Search
Relocation Appraisal - Find Relocation Appraisers Domain Reseller - Business Opportunity
Home Security Buzz - Home Security Info Radon Testing - Radon Gas Info
My Medicare Forum - Medicare Info Stop Smoking Help - Help Quitting Smoking
CordlessPhoneStore.com - Great Cordless Phones AndroidTabletCity.com - Android Tablet Computers

Follow AppraisersForum.com:          Find us on Facebook            Follow us on Twitter


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:38 AM.

SiteMap: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93