Real Estate Appraisal Forum

appraisersforum.com logo
The Premiere Online Community for Real Estate Appraisers!
 Fastest Way to Find a Real Estate Appraiser Enter Zip Code:
 
 
Go Back   Appraisers Forum > Real Estate Appraisal Forums > Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, USPAP
Register Help Our Rules Calendar Archives Mark Forums Read


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 06-30-2007, 08:27 PM
ibvoor ibvoor is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Yardley, PA
State: Pennsylvania
Professional Status: Certified Residential Appraiser
Posts: 26
Default Condo- Design (style) 1073 Form

This is not a big deal, but I am interested in knowing what others do.

Our office uses Day 1 Forms. In the sales comparison approach grid, the line that states "Design (style)" is confusing to me. Do they want the style of the project (ie high-rise, lo-rise, garden etc), or do they want the style of the unit (flat, bi-level, townhouse etc). There are other places on the form where both types of information are already stated.

Which information do you provide? Is there some document out there that clearly states what is expected to go in that line of information?

Thanks,
Iva Voorhees
Sponsored Links

  #2  
Old 06-30-2007, 08:42 PM
PropertyEconomics's Avatar
PropertyEconomics PropertyEconomics is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Central New Mexico
State: New Mexico
Professional Status: Certified General Appraiser
Posts: 18,334
Default

I would think any Residential Appraisal book by Henry Harrison would be a good source for you to find that information.
  #3  
Old 06-30-2007, 08:49 PM
Mike Boyd Mike Boyd is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
State: California
Professional Status: Certified Residential Appraiser
Posts: 11,822
Default

Good question. I don't recall that ever coming up here. That leads me to think most clients do not care. I use townhouse or garden. I have never done a condo in more than a 4 story building but I suppose if that is what you were appraising, High Rise might be a good choice.
  #4  
Old 07-01-2007, 12:58 PM
Don Clark's Avatar
Don Clark Don Clark is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
State: Virginia
Professional Status: Certified Residential Appraiser
Posts: 8,666
Default

I took a course through Fannie Mae in May 2005 to teach others how to use the "new" Fannie Mae forms. When dealing with the unit, the units style should be noted. When answering questions about the condo complex, the complex style should be noted. They could be one and the same but will sometimes be different.

I use a text (a nationaly recognized publisher) when teaching appraisal courses. I find that the information relative to filling in the form(s) is for the most part wrong. I have written to the publisher so far to no avail. For example. When the publisher list the style of a house(1004 form) it is listed as either 1 story or 2 story. It should be ranch, colonial or whatever is the appropriate style. And, when describint the improvements(Example w/w carpeting) they never put the condition. If you look carefully at the form it calls not only for the material but it's condition. I have been told that 2 of their text are being rewritten and would I like to review them prior to publisheing. The answer is ....


Hell Yes!
__________________
AQB Certified USPAP Instructor,Member VaCAP,NCPAC, Expert Witness, Consultant/Peer Assistance
  #5  
Old 07-01-2007, 01:20 PM
ibvoor ibvoor is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Yardley, PA
State: Pennsylvania
Professional Status: Certified Residential Appraiser
Posts: 26
Default

Thanks for the replies. Don, your suggestion of putting in the unit, not project, design makes the most sense to me now that I think about it. The sales comparison grid deals mostly with details of the individual unit.

Like I said, it is not a big deal - and you are correct, Mike, in that I have never been questioned on it even though I have put both project and unit design in that line.

I would like to try to complete the information how it is intended, even though there is much to be desired in trying to interpret these new forms.

Thanks, again.
  #6  
Old 07-01-2007, 06:47 PM
Greg Parker's Avatar
Greg Parker Greg Parker is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Philadelphia, PA Suburbs
State: Pennsylvania
Professional Status: Certified Residential Appraiser
Posts: 929
Default

I use that form more than anything, and Mr. Clark is hitting the nail on the head.

For that section, I typically use flat, garden or townhouse. On rare occasions, I use Bi-level for the very rare two story unit in a high rise building.
__________________
AMC Logic. 2+2 = Fish.
Sponsored Links

Closed Thread


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump




Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
     Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at AppraiserSites.com

Fastest Way to Find a Real Estate Appraiser Enter Zip Code:
Partner Sites:
AppraiserUSA.com - National Appraiser Directory AllDomainsUSA.com - Domain Name Registration
DeadbeatListings.com - Deadbeat ListingsAppraiserSites.com - Web Hosting for the Professional Real Estate Appraiser
Find FHA Appraisers - FHA Appraiser Search Commercial Appraisers - Commercial Appraiser Search
Relocation Appraisal - Find Relocation Appraisers Domain Reseller - Business Opportunity
Home Security Buzz - Home Security Info Radon Testing - Radon Gas Info
My Medicare Forum - Medicare Info Stop Smoking Help - Help Quitting Smoking
CordlessPhoneStore.com - Great Cordless Phones AndroidTabletCity.com - Android Tablet Computers

Follow AppraisersForum.com:          Find us on Facebook            Follow us on Twitter


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:31 AM.

SiteMap: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93