Real Estate Appraisal Forum

appraisersforum.com logo
The Premiere Online Community for Real Estate Appraisers!
 Fastest Way to Find a Real Estate Appraiser Enter Zip Code:
 
 
Go Back   Appraisers Forum > Real Estate Appraisal Forums > Manufactured Housing
Register Help Our Rules Calendar Archives Mark Forums Read


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 07-16-2007, 02:58 PM
Susan Klimaszewski's Avatar
Susan Klimaszewski Susan Klimaszewski is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Central Texas
State: Texas
Professional Status: Licensed Appraiser
Posts: 395
Default Need NADA Info Please

This is the 1st manufactured home I've done since 2004 (thanks alot Ocwen) and I need the current Grey, White and Yellow Page Numbers from the NADA. My book is from 2004 which is to say the least, dated.

It is an Oakwood Series 1000, Model 1082 Double Wide, 32x48
(16x48 per) built in 2000. WS Region.

Thanks for any help!
Sponsored Links

  #2  
Old 07-16-2007, 03:09 PM
CANative's Avatar
CANative CANative is online now
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hopland, CA
State: California
Professional Status: Certified Residential Appraiser
Posts: 44,814
Default

How are just the page numbers going to help you if you don't have current cost tables?

You "could" go to www.swiftestimator.com and for $8.00 do a quick cost approach using the manufactured home style. You just have to rate the quality whereas NADA is model specific. I could give you the NADA quality rating.
__________________
"OMG! What's wrong with you?"
  #3  
Old 07-16-2007, 03:12 PM
Susan Klimaszewski's Avatar
Susan Klimaszewski Susan Klimaszewski is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Central Texas
State: Texas
Professional Status: Licensed Appraiser
Posts: 395
Default

I am using marshall and swift for the cost approach but the cost approach asks for Other Data Identification which indicates NADA supplied page numbers. Is this not the correct way to do it if you are using Marshall and Swift?
  #4  
Old 07-16-2007, 03:17 PM
Mr Rex's Avatar
Mr Rex Mr Rex is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: X Marks the spot
State: North Carolina
Professional Status: Certified Residential Appraiser
Posts: 25,694
Default

You do either or, you don't have to do both. FWIW, I stopped using NADA when I stopped doing new manufactured homes. NADA does a poor job with depreciation IMO unless nearly new.
__________________
You talking to me?

Last edited by Mr Rex : 07-16-2007 at 03:22 PM.
  #5  
Old 07-16-2007, 03:20 PM
Susan Klimaszewski's Avatar
Susan Klimaszewski Susan Klimaszewski is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Central Texas
State: Texas
Professional Status: Licensed Appraiser
Posts: 395
Default

So I only have to use M+S and do not have to fill in the "Other Data Identification" section? I soooooo thought I was done having to do manufactured homes ever again.

Thanks!
  #6  
Old 07-16-2007, 03:23 PM
CANative's Avatar
CANative CANative is online now
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hopland, CA
State: California
Professional Status: Certified Residential Appraiser
Posts: 44,814
Default

That's true Rex. But you can adjust the depreciation by condition modifiers and changing the accessories, options and components to newer years (if the conditiona and updating indicate that is the case) The other problem with NADA is that the quality rating goes down with the age of the home. For instance, Susan's home was yellow chart page 300 when new but now that it is 7 years old the yellow chart page is 311 or 312 (depending on CD or book) 300 yellow chart is Standard Quality, Class III Low. But yellow chart page 312 is Economy Quality, High Class I. The difference when converted to "FNMA/FHLMC" is Average to Fair. But the quality (when built did not change)

Susan.. Per NADA the Oakwood Series 1000 built by Oakwood was of the lower end of the Average quality construction range.

Like Rex said: One source or the other; fill in the cells as appropriate for the data source you're using.
__________________
"OMG! What's wrong with you?"
  #7  
Old 07-16-2007, 03:27 PM
Susan Klimaszewski's Avatar
Susan Klimaszewski Susan Klimaszewski is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Central Texas
State: Texas
Professional Status: Licensed Appraiser
Posts: 395
Default

Thank you all. As always, I appreciate the help! Now to just find comps. Out of 113 sales, 71 are REO's which is ok because this is an Ocwen, but NONE of them are on acreage even remotely similar to mine unless they are 2100 sq ft and mine is only 1449 sq ft. This is going to be ugly.

Last edited by Susan Klimaszewski : 07-16-2007 at 03:29 PM.
  #8  
Old 07-17-2007, 07:07 AM
Carnivore's Avatar
Carnivore Carnivore is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Queen City
State: North Carolina
Professional Status: Certified Residential Appraiser
Posts: 12,564
Default

Susan,

The NADA books cost $100 dollars a year. Thats it! You get three issues.

It would be a good idea for you to subscribe and learn how to use them.
  #9  
Old 07-17-2007, 07:36 AM
Susan Klimaszewski's Avatar
Susan Klimaszewski Susan Klimaszewski is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Central Texas
State: Texas
Professional Status: Licensed Appraiser
Posts: 395
Default

Quote:
The NADA books cost $100 dollars a year. Thats it! You get three issues.

It would be a good idea for you to subscribe and learn how to use them.
For crying out loud Picarsic, I have NADA books up until 2004 when my office stopped doing manufactured homes. Nothing I said indicated that I had never subscribed or didn't know how to use them. I prefer to use M&S for manufactured homes but had to have NADA in the past since some lenders insisted on it. Ocwen doesn't, so why should I re-subscribe for 1 job in the past 3 years for a client that doesn't insist on NADA?

My only confusion was the cost approach form asking for "Other Data Identification" with spaces to supply the appropriate page number for NADA.
  #10  
Old 07-17-2007, 07:51 AM
Carnivore's Avatar
Carnivore Carnivore is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Queen City
State: North Carolina
Professional Status: Certified Residential Appraiser
Posts: 12,564
Default

I'm sorry! Since others provide additional information about NADA, I misunderstood your question or what you wanted!
Sponsored Links

Closed Thread


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump




Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
     Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at AppraiserSites.com

Fastest Way to Find a Real Estate Appraiser Enter Zip Code:
Partner Sites:
AppraiserUSA.com - National Appraiser Directory AllDomainsUSA.com - Domain Name Registration
DeadbeatListings.com - Deadbeat ListingsAppraiserSites.com - Web Hosting for the Professional Real Estate Appraiser
Find FHA Appraisers - FHA Appraiser Search Commercial Appraisers - Commercial Appraiser Search
Relocation Appraisal - Find Relocation Appraisers Domain Reseller - Business Opportunity
Home Security Buzz - Home Security Info Radon Testing - Radon Gas Info
My Medicare Forum - Medicare Info Stop Smoking Help - Help Quitting Smoking
CordlessPhoneStore.com - Great Cordless Phones AndroidTabletCity.com - Android Tablet Computers

Follow AppraisersForum.com:          Find us on Facebook            Follow us on Twitter


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:29 PM.

SiteMap: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93