Real Estate Appraisal Forum

appraisersforum.com logo
The Premiere Online Community for Real Estate Appraisers!
 Fastest Way to Find a Real Estate Appraiser Enter Zip Code:
 
 
Go Back   Appraisers Forum > Real Estate Appraisal Forums > Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, USPAP
Register Help Our Rules Calendar Archives Mark Forums Read


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 02-23-2009, 11:30 AM
vanguard vanguard is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
State: Minnesota
Professional Status: Retired Appraiser
Posts: 943
Default The 1004 MC form & driving by the comparables

The new forms label the selection in the "Inventory Analysis" and Median Sale & List Price" section as "Comparable Sales". Based on USPAP and the reporting requirements, the appraiser must view the comparables from the street. If they don't then a violation of USPAP has occurred. Based on my interpretation this may require significant drive time if your selection of comparables in each monthly category is substantial. You could have 10-30 Comparable sales in each of the three monthly segments. This may require driving by 30-90 properties which in turn may require extended hours in an effort to view all of the comparable sales. Turn times would have to be discarded in an effort to complete each report. In addition, photos may be necessary which would load up a report with unnecessary file information. I realize that this might be contrived; however, it is a realistic concern for those who wish to be USPAP compliant. I have heard that REL's Valuation has utilized a form similar to this; although, I do not know how successful it has been. I have been thinking about sending a letter off to each of the States Appraisal Boards regarding this concern.

Last edited by vanguard : 02-23-2009 at 11:31 AM. Reason: correction
Sponsored Links

  #2  
Old 02-23-2009, 11:38 AM
VegasWayne's Avatar
VegasWayne VegasWayne is online now
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Area 24
State: Nevada
Professional Status: Licensed Appraiser
Posts: 2,114
Default

Where in USPAP does it say that comparables must be viewed? It is not in my copy.
  #3  
Old 02-23-2009, 11:42 AM
TJSum TJSum is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Absurdastan
State: Maryland
Professional Status: Certified Residential Appraiser
Posts: 5,030
Default

The top of the grid on page two states the same thing. Have you been driving all the listings and sales for these and provided photos since the new forms have been in use? I hate the new form just as much as everyone else, but I think you are barking up the wrong tree...
__________________
Model Citizen
  #4  
Old 02-23-2009, 11:48 AM
Vetteman Vetteman is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
State: Florida
Professional Status: Certified Residential Appraiser
Posts: 529
Default

I agree with you Robert. There is much about this new form that lacks clear direction. Yet many on this forum are rushing to fill it out, sign it and send it in. Some say they can do it in 10 minutes, some say up to a week. All are arguing about what they are going to charge. An accurate count of "comparable" sales and listings in the neighborhood, as defined on the first page of the report, would need to include 1) a definition of what is considered to be comparable and 2) all the comparable properties sold and listed, both MLS and FSBO, including developer. If you cannot defend those counts, then what you put in the boxes is misleading. Providing misleading information is a violation of USPAP. Until they revise the form, I am filling it out with an asterik in the boxes - * Unable to reliably complete this field due to...
  #5  
Old 02-23-2009, 11:49 AM
Peter LeQuire's Avatar
Peter LeQuire Peter LeQuire is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: A long way from Nutbush
State: Tennessee
Professional Status: Certified Residential Appraiser
Posts: 5,685
Default

The comparables which the appraiser certifies that s/he has viewed are the comparables used in the sales comparison approach in the 1004, not the population of sales/listings that make up the market trends analysis.
  #6  
Old 02-23-2009, 11:54 AM
George Hatch's Avatar
George Hatch George Hatch is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Carlsbad, California
State: California
Professional Status: Certified General Appraiser
Posts: 16,310
Default

You're confusing Fannie's requirements for their assignments with the (much lower) minimum requirements that apply to all appraisal practice as laid out in USPAP. Fannie's appraisal policies speak to exterior inspection and photos of the direct comparables in the Sales Comparison - USPAP doesn't because that's not a minimum requirement that applies to all appraisal assignments.

Now if Fannie required appraisers to do exterior inspections of all the sales data used to analyze the market conditions then it would be a different story - USPAP comes into play only because these user-defined requirements are part of the assignment conditions.

But so far, Fannie isn't asking appraisers to perform inspections on every single listing in a subject's market segment - just those sales presented as direct comparables in the appraisal report. One other thing to remember is that Fannie defines "Comparables" differently for the 1004mc than anywhere else. They refer to properties "the buyers would consider to be comparable", not the "sales that are locationally, physically and functionally the most similar to the subject property" as appears in Cert #7 on the URAR.

There's a big difference between the two. Really, I think Fannie should have used a different term in the 1004mc.
  #7  
Old 02-23-2009, 11:58 AM
George Hatch's Avatar
George Hatch George Hatch is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Carlsbad, California
State: California
Professional Status: Certified General Appraiser
Posts: 16,310
Default

BTW, Fannie has already acknowledged the limitations of the databases used by appraisers. They already know they won't be getting medians and FSBOs and that some MLS systems will have better data than others. Seeing as how Fannie has already acknowledged these and other limitations, that I don't see where "misleading" comes into it.

If you don't want to do it because you aren't getting paid enough it would probably be more honest to simply say that in your report.
  #8  
Old 02-23-2009, 01:07 PM
Vetteman Vetteman is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
State: Florida
Professional Status: Certified Residential Appraiser
Posts: 529
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by George Hatch View Post
One other thing to remember is that Fannie defines "Comparables" differently for the 1004mc than anywhere else. They refer to properties "the buyers would consider to be comparable", not the "sales that are locationally, physically and functionally the most similar to the subject property" as appears in Cert #7 on the URAR.
Cert #7 refers to the comparables used in the sales analysis grid, because they are, in the appraiser's opinion, the most similar. There are no other sales that are more similar. Page 2 of the report (at the top) is looking for all comparable sales in the past 12 months, as well as all current comparable listings. I have always assumed that Fannie is looking for data here on comparables that fall within their guidelines, or maybe mine, but where does one draw the line? At what point does a sale or listing become not comparable? When the 2005 forms first came out, I saw this as a vague attempt to gather a little more information on what is happening in the market and treated it as such. Quite frankly I end up only reporting the number of comparable sales and listings that are +/- 15% of my final value estimate.

The new 1004mc form is obviously a hasty attempt to gather more specific data, most of which is either not available or unreliable. I can't wait until they come up with the 1004cba addendum...the crystal ball approach. If we appraisers could only tell them where the market is going from here. Financial advisers are paid quite handsomely to do that, unfortunately they are always optimistic.

Last edited by Vetteman : 02-23-2009 at 01:32 PM.
  #9  
Old 02-23-2009, 01:13 PM
David Beasley David Beasley is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Between Raleigh & Fayetteville
State: North Carolina
Professional Status: Certified Residential Appraiser
Posts: 1,071
Default

Robert, I think you are *way* overthinking this thing. You have to view and photograph the comps and any listings you actually submit in an appraisal report and use to derive your end-use value opinion...you don't have to view and photograph comps contained within a quasi-statistical analysis, which is all the 1004MC is. Were that the case, we'd already be out days on end shooting images of the sales we use to report the SFR sales/age ranges in the neighborhood section of the 1004, as well as the "comps and listings" shown at the top of 1004/Page 2. You aren't driving by and photographing all those now, are you? God bless you if you are, but it isn't needed and certainly isn't required.

Besides, I don't really think that USPAP is the entity that demands we view and photograph comps used in our reports. I think those specific demands technically come from the agencies that are intended as the ultimate end users: Fannie, Freddie, HUD, VA etc.
  #10  
Old 02-23-2009, 01:47 PM
John Hassler John Hassler is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
State: California
Professional Status: Certified Residential Appraiser
Posts: 2,226
Default

I've come to the conclusion that the 1004mc will need a solid half page SOW addendum. In most cases I anticipate the 1004mc to be treated much like a request for an unnecessary Cost Approach; that which is not relevant to the appraisal problem but is an assignment condition of the client's.
__________________

Sponsored Links

Closed Thread


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump




Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
     Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at AppraiserSites.com

Fastest Way to Find a Real Estate Appraiser Enter Zip Code:
Partner Sites:
AppraiserUSA.com - National Appraiser Directory AllDomainsUSA.com - Domain Name Registration
DeadbeatListings.com - Deadbeat ListingsAppraiserSites.com - Web Hosting for the Professional Real Estate Appraiser
Find FHA Appraisers - FHA Appraiser Search Commercial Appraisers - Commercial Appraiser Search
Relocation Appraisal - Find Relocation Appraisers Domain Reseller - Business Opportunity
Home Security Buzz - Home Security Info Radon Testing - Radon Gas Info
My Medicare Forum - Medicare Info Stop Smoking Help - Help Quitting Smoking
CordlessPhoneStore.com - Great Cordless Phones AndroidTabletCity.com - Android Tablet Computers

Follow AppraisersForum.com:          Find us on Facebook            Follow us on Twitter


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:52 PM.

SiteMap: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93