Real Estate Appraisal Forum

appraisersforum.com logo
The Premiere Online Community for Real Estate Appraisers!
 Fastest Way to Find a Real Estate Appraiser Enter Zip Code:
 
 
Go Back   Appraisers Forum > Real Estate Appraisal Forums > Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, USPAP
Register Help Our Rules Calendar Archives Mark Forums Read


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 11-02-2009, 07:32 PM
Terrel L. Shields's Avatar
Terrel L. Shields Terrel L. Shields is online now
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Springtown, AmeRica
State: Arkansas
Professional Status: Certified General Appraiser
Posts: 39,807
Default How I stopped worrying & learned to love updates

Banks, Examiners, Appraisers, Updates
THINK in-house NOT fannie mae or secondary market, but even there the implication is the lender, if a regulated bank, is in the hot seat over this issue.

What next? I have alluded to problems with Examiners telling bankers that they need to have "updates" of appraisals done when a loan is renewed, and telling those bankers that their appraisers can do something much shorter than an appraisal (and do so competitively with bank evaluations). They argue that you can just do a few comparable sales and update the value from an older appraisal.

Today, local appraisers for a bank were asked to meet with the QC appraisal reviewers of the bank. About 12-15 appraisers were there. They were not talking about appraisals but rather how to ‘update’ an existing appraisal which might be 6 mo. - 2 years old. They are doing so under pressure from the FDIC / State bank examiners.

The form they held out as the ‘correct’ form was alamode’s Update Appraisal form... one page, no certs, and they asked only to support our value with a minimum of a single comparable....They read AO-3 btw, a whole lot differently than most appraisers here would do. We pointed out that none of us was comfortable gauging whether the market was up or down based solely on one sale...nor was anyone happy about the implication that a single page was adequate for a report even if attached to a prior appraisal.

The bank doesn’t care if the value is the same or higher. They don’t need that value. BUT to calculate a new LTV (loan to value) IF the value is less than the original report, they have a problem. The value drop has to be small enough that the LTV is still adequate, no problem and no big expense to the borrower. But if it is lower, and most of the properties will be lower, much lower could trigger a full blown appraisal. The real problem is the frequency (annual that the Examiners want) and cost...especially for commercial properties.

The bank’s concern, particularly on commercial and large properties, is not sticking their customer with full appraisal fees annually or bi-annually. They want a short form...read cheap. The meeting stirred quite a hornets nest and they withdrew the proposal to have a Update form and a single comp for residential property. But the issue of land, agri, and commercial remained unresolved. However, a couple of well respected appraisers did say they were providing restricted reports to a "limited scope" [at this point, my tongue was already bloodied and too swollen to even groan] for all but the most complex properties.

I give up. How can you provides such a service? Is someone teaching a step by step course on how to "update" a report without calling it an update, using much less data, arriving at a value estimate, and doing so for say 25% of the original fee? Just shoot me. 95% of the properties appraised in 2007 will be lower this year. That triggers at a minimum that we get enough data to support a lowering of the value and write a compliant report...It is more wordsmithing and how can it take less time and be cheaper?

The moderator noted that they got negative feedback on this and "updates were from $75 - $350 so $350 ones were unacceptable and they quit using those appraisers!
__________________
being able to swear at people in their own language does not make you multi-lingual.
Sponsored Links

  #2  
Old 11-02-2009, 08:10 PM
Denis DeSaix Denis DeSaix is online now
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Northern California
State: California
Professional Status: Certified General Appraiser
Posts: 14,761
Default

I don't have a problem with a bank wanting a limited SOW assignment in order to drive-down the cost of the appraisal (assuming the limitations are such that the results of the assignment still meet the client's needs). If I'm going to do less work, I can charge less for what I do. The problem, however, is that the amount of work necessary to complete an assignment is not solely dependent on the SOW alone.

Here's a hypothetical SOW that can probably satisfy many lender's needs.
A. Confirm the H&BU.
B. Use an EA about the condition/configuration of the subject based on previous appraisal (client-supplied).
C. Review and analyze the comparable data.
D. Provide the opinion of value.
E. Provide one comparable as an example of the competition.
F. Drive subject and take photo.
G. Communicate results in a restricted-use format report.

If I'm working in a tract development with plenty of sales & listings and nothing fancy, how long is that going to take me? Not long.

On the other hand, if data is scarce, then it doesn't matter if I have the same SOW, the appraisal process is going to take a lot longer even if the reporting results look the same.

A one-size fits all SOW may work for 90% of all a bank's properties. But SOW is only one part of the work-component equation. If you have to spend 8-hours analyzing scarce data to come up with the best comparables, the streamlined SOW does not really simplify the appraisal process and does not result in lower costs.
  #3  
Old 11-02-2009, 09:16 PM
Terrel L. Shields's Avatar
Terrel L. Shields Terrel L. Shields is online now
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Springtown, AmeRica
State: Arkansas
Professional Status: Certified General Appraiser
Posts: 39,807
Default

Where weighting has been given to Income or Cost, then sales don't tell the story...especially when you are talking about types of properties that rarely sell
__________________
being able to swear at people in their own language does not make you multi-lingual.
  #4  
Old 11-02-2009, 10:56 PM
Denis DeSaix Denis DeSaix is online now
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Northern California
State: California
Professional Status: Certified General Appraiser
Posts: 14,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Terrel L. Shields View Post
Where weighting has been given to Income or Cost, then sales don't tell the story...especially when you are talking about types of properties that rarely sell
I agree with you.
  #5  
Old 11-03-2009, 05:28 AM
Dennis J. Black, ASA, IFAS Dennis J. Black, ASA, IFAS is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Port Charlotte, Florida
State: Florida
Professional Status: Certified General Appraiser
Posts: 1,606
Default

Appraisals are about due diligence and given that Scope of Work is driven by intended use I see the situation as such.

They are making a loan, AGAIN.

H & B use is where the rubber meets the road. I mean real H & B use analysis. You know, where you actually try and quantify supply and demand for a use. That could have changed tremendously in those time frames. Just think residential subdivision.

Market rent and cap rate could be far different today.
__________________
Dennis J. Black, MRICS, ASA, IFAC
  #6  
Old 11-03-2009, 06:33 AM
Michael Tipton's Avatar
Michael Tipton Michael Tipton is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SW Florida
State: Florida
Professional Status: Certified Residential Appraiser
Posts: 2,759
Default

Does USPAP address which form to utilize when completing an appraisal? Not that I am aware of. I would have countered with the USPAP, which I am required to adhere to whenever an appraisal assignment is completed. Appears your bankers are only thinking of "saving" client's funds. As Mr. Black suggested, any appraisal "update" is driven by H & B use and the SOW, as long as the SOW is not limited to the extent the results might be mis-leading.

Time and effort is the factors I consider when quoting a fee, not based on the form only.
  #7  
Old 11-04-2009, 07:36 PM
Terrel L. Shields's Avatar
Terrel L. Shields Terrel L. Shields is online now
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Springtown, AmeRica
State: Arkansas
Professional Status: Certified General Appraiser
Posts: 39,807
Default

Quote:
Appraisals are about due diligence and given that Scope of Work is driven by intended use I see the situation as such. They are making a loan, AGAIN.
That was what they thought but we bucked up over the "UPDATE" form provided by alamode [thanks ala mode for giving us a crap form for them to wave around. Why would anyone think that putting such a form in a software package would ever give a lender the idea that made the form "USPAP" compliant.] If you don't do the 'loser' short form [short for them, long on time for me] a. k. a. - a desktop or driveby...
So who gets to dictate SOW? me or thee?

The problem is is soluable because it would require ASB & bank regulators to agree on some sort of "update" format and I fear those two egos could never fit in same room let along agree on a special situation for lenders / updates only.
__________________
being able to swear at people in their own language does not make you multi-lingual.
  #8  
Old 11-05-2009, 12:53 PM
CANative's Avatar
CANative CANative is online now
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hopland, CA
State: California
Professional Status: Certified Residential Appraiser
Posts: 46,425
Default

A scene from the movie "Dr. Countrywide or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bonus."

__________________
“The peasants are revolting? Why yes, they are quite revolting.” ~ Oscar Wilde
  #9  
Old 11-05-2009, 04:29 PM
CANative's Avatar
CANative CANative is online now
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hopland, CA
State: California
Professional Status: Certified Residential Appraiser
Posts: 46,425
Default

C'mon. This was funny. Angelo's head on Slim Picken's body?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Boyd View Post
A scene from the movie "Dr. Countrywide or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bonus."

__________________
“The peasants are revolting? Why yes, they are quite revolting.” ~ Oscar Wilde
  #10  
Old 11-05-2009, 05:00 PM
Terrel L. Shields's Avatar
Terrel L. Shields Terrel L. Shields is online now
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Springtown, AmeRica
State: Arkansas
Professional Status: Certified General Appraiser
Posts: 39,807
Default

If we could be so lucky
__________________
being able to swear at people in their own language does not make you multi-lingual.
Sponsored Links

Closed Thread


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump




Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
     Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at AppraiserSites.com

Fastest Way to Find a Real Estate Appraiser Enter Zip Code:
Partner Sites:
AppraiserUSA.com - National Appraiser Directory AllDomainsUSA.com - Domain Name Registration
DeadbeatListings.com - Deadbeat ListingsAppraiserSites.com - Web Hosting for the Professional Real Estate Appraiser
Find FHA Appraisers - FHA Appraiser Search Commercial Appraisers - Commercial Appraiser Search
Relocation Appraisal - Find Relocation Appraisers Domain Reseller - Business Opportunity
Home Security Buzz - Home Security Info Radon Testing - Radon Gas Info
My Medicare Forum - Medicare Info Stop Smoking Help - Help Quitting Smoking
CordlessPhoneStore.com - Great Cordless Phones AndroidTabletCity.com - Android Tablet Computers

Follow AppraisersForum.com:          Find us on Facebook            Follow us on Twitter


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:56 PM.

SiteMap: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93