Real Estate Appraisal Forum

appraisersforum.com logo
The Premiere Online Community for Real Estate Appraisers!
 Fastest Way to Find a Real Estate Appraiser Enter Zip Code:
 
 
Go Back   Appraisers Forum > Real Estate Appraisal Forums > General Appraisal Discussion
Register Help Our Rules Calendar Archives Mark Forums Read


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 12-02-2003, 01:22 PM
CKrinsky CKrinsky is offline
 
Join Date: May 2003
State: New York
Professional Status: Certified Residential Appraiser
Posts: 41
Default

I had an order for one purchase of a house and a bungalow. Turned out that each was on a separate parcel, althought they were being sold together. The assessor has two property cards, two separate parcel #'s; the building department considers them to be two separate lots that can each be legally transferred as single family dwellings.

I did two appraisals, one of each dwelling. One is a bungalow of 500 SF +/-. My client /lender is not able to find a bank that will take the loan; they will not lend on a house of less than 700 SF. THe lender has asked me to combine the two parcels onto one SF appraisal and considered the smaller bungalow as an accessory dwelling. The lender said that the "last appraiser did this for the current owner." I'm 99.9% sure that I cannot do this, but before I say no, I need advice from the experts. Thanks for your help.
Sponsored Links

  #2  
Old 12-02-2003, 01:28 PM
Austin Austin is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Blairs, Virginia
State: Virginia
Professional Status: Certified General Appraiser
Posts: 5,020
Default

The question is: What is the highest and best use; assembled or two separate properties? If you explain that assembled is not the highest and best use and yields a lower opinion of value I don't think you should have a problem. Just make sure you don't mislead and make it clear what you are doing. I would also state that this appraisal is not based on highest and best use and the value conlcusion is not valid for any other purpose other than this particular appraisal request and under the use assumption imposed by the client.
  #3  
Old 12-02-2003, 01:42 PM
Richard Carlsen's Avatar
Richard Carlsen Richard Carlsen is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Tip of the Mitt: Northern Michigan
State: Michigan
Professional Status: Licensed Appraiser
Posts: 8,372
Default

Connie

Of course you can.

Two words: Hypothetical Condition

"At the specific request of the client, the two seperate parcels are to be considered and valued as one parcel. This may not be the Highest and Best Use of the property. Extreme care should be taken if the value contained herein is to be used for lending consideration. The client is specifically warned that the value conclusions in this report, based on the requested hypothetical conditions, may not reflect the actual value of the properties as constitute."

Or words to that effect and then go forth looking for your comps.

Good luck
__________________
Now it's time to go fishing and ride the bike........
  #4  
Old 12-02-2003, 01:48 PM
Tim Hicks (Texas)'s Avatar
Tim Hicks (Texas) Tim Hicks (Texas) is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Crowley
State: Texas
Professional Status: Certified Residential Appraiser
Posts: 11,961
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Richard Carlsen@Dec 2 2003, 12:42 PM
Connie

Of course you can.

Two words:* Hypothetical Condition

"At the specific request of the client, the two seperate parcels are to be considered and valued as one parcel.* This may not be the Highest and Best Use of the property.* Extreme care should be taken if the value contained herein is to be used for lending consideration.* The client is specifically warned that the value conclusions in this report, based on the requested hypothetical conditions, may not reflect the actual value of the properties as constitute."

Or words to that effect and then go forth looking for your comps.

Good luck
Bingo! I have lenders require half duplex properties that are on divided lots and taxed separately combined into one appraisal because they are sold that way. Years ago, I was told separate properties, separate appraisals because you can sell one without selling the other. I have been instructed to do separate appraisals for that very reason. However, sometimes the lender only wants to make one loan with one appraisal. The Hypothetical condition covers your bases and puts the appraisal in the scope provided by the lender. Just make sure the lender puts their requirements in writing.
__________________
Please don't log on here and ask for our blessings unless you are prepared to accept the truth.
  #5  
Old 12-02-2003, 02:13 PM
Mickey Stevens Mickey Stevens is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: No where
State: Dom. Republic
Professional Status: Certified Residential Appraiser
Posts: 309
Default

It sounds to me like you may just have a guest house. If seen several properties with small guest houses. The tracts having separate parcel numbers isn't necessarily an issue. It's not unusual for homes that have additional lots to have separate parcel numbers. As long as the parcels are next to each other they could be marketed and sold as one property. I would consider how potential buyers would view the property. Would they see the bungalow as a guest house or additional amenity to the other house or would they see it as a separate property. If the bungalow is too small to be marketed individually that could figure into the highest and best use question.

One more thought. Is there a single contract or two separate contracts. If there are separate contracts for each parcel I would be more leary of appraising them together.
  #6  
Old 12-02-2003, 02:38 PM
Joe Moore Joe Moore is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
State: Pennsylvania
Professional Status: Appraisal Management Company
Posts: 288
Default

The report would have to be "subject to" if they aren't under one deed.

Joe
  #7  
Old 12-02-2003, 03:46 PM
Tawfik Ahdab's Avatar
Tawfik Ahdab Tawfik Ahdab is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Central Oregon Coast
State: Oregon
Professional Status: Certified Residential Appraiser
Posts: 1,827
Default

I disagree with Joe, but Richard got it right. As you have been advised, do not fail to PROMINENTLY note the extremely limited reliability of the appraisal and value conclusion due to the client-imposed hypothetical condition invoked, especially at the statement of the value conclusion.
  #8  
Old 12-02-2003, 04:09 PM
Richard Carlsen's Avatar
Richard Carlsen Richard Carlsen is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Tip of the Mitt: Northern Michigan
State: Michigan
Professional Status: Licensed Appraiser
Posts: 8,372
Default

Subject to what Joe?

There is nothing to finish or complete or fix or separate or combine. You are just pretending that the two houses are tied together in such a way that they cannot be separated and it's your job is to appraise them. Our "pretend" word is "hypothetical condition". That's what we appraisers say when we pretend.

It's up to us to tell the client that we are doing exactly what they want us to do and to warn the client that this may be a risky thing to do. Then we go ahead and do it just like the client wants. It may not provide the most accurate results but the methodology is what the client wants and that's what he gets. Once we have done that, we are finished and there is nothing more on that order that needs to be done or checked or finished to make the appraisal complete.
__________________
Now it's time to go fishing and ride the bike........
  #9  
Old 12-02-2003, 07:14 PM
Phil Chamberlin Phil Chamberlin is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
State: California
Professional Status: Certified General Appraiser
Posts: 126
Default

Highest & best use may be to combine both parcels on the report - if as stated, no financing would be available for the 500 sq ft house on its own parcel.
  #10  
Old 12-02-2003, 07:26 PM
Caterina Platt's Avatar
Caterina Platt Caterina Platt is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Central New Mexico
State: New Mexico
Professional Status: Certified Residential Appraiser
Posts: 4,790
Default

My only concern would be if the two are assumed to be combined, is it legally permissable? Check with your zoning department. I've had lenders force the issue of combining separate parcels so that there's no outside chance one component could be sold out from under the mortgage. If they required the parcels to be combined, could it be done?
Sponsored Links

Closed Thread


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump




Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
     Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at AppraiserSites.com

Fastest Way to Find a Real Estate Appraiser Enter Zip Code:
Partner Sites:
AppraiserUSA.com - National Appraiser Directory AllDomainsUSA.com - Domain Name Registration
DeadbeatListings.com - Deadbeat ListingsAppraiserSites.com - Web Hosting for the Professional Real Estate Appraiser
Find FHA Appraisers - FHA Appraiser Search Commercial Appraisers - Commercial Appraiser Search
Relocation Appraisal - Find Relocation Appraisers Domain Reseller - Business Opportunity
Home Security Buzz - Home Security Info Radon Testing - Radon Gas Info
My Medicare Forum - Medicare Info Stop Smoking Help - Help Quitting Smoking
CordlessPhoneStore.com - Great Cordless Phones AndroidTabletCity.com - Android Tablet Computers

Follow AppraisersForum.com:          Find us on Facebook            Follow us on Twitter


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:39 AM.

SiteMap: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93