Real Estate Appraisal Forum

appraisersforum.com logo
The Premiere Online Community for Real Estate Appraisers!
 Fastest Way to Find a Real Estate Appraiser Enter Zip Code:
 
 
Go Back   Appraisers Forum > Real Estate Appraisal Forums > General Appraisal Discussion
Register Help Our Rules Calendar Archives Mark Forums Read


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 12-21-2004, 09:20 AM
Pamela Crowley (Florida)'s Avatar
Pamela Crowley (Florida) Pamela Crowley (Florida) is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Wherever We Are Parked
State: Florida
Professional Status: Retired Appraiser
Posts: 25,254
Default

Here is a copy of what I'm writing in a Review:

One-Unit Residential Appraisal Field Review Report:

1- Prior Sales and/or listings of subject and sales used as comparables in Original Appraisal Report being Reviewed:

No prior sales or MLS data of any kind found for subject. It appears the Appraiser did not have access to or utilized MLS data. The sales used as comparables have data in the local NEFAR MLS that is not used in the Appraisal Report.

Prior transfer of Sale #1 was a builder purchase of an older house on a double lot that was split (*** Xxxxxxx Ave, Co ID #####), a new house was built on part of that parcel and sold with a new address (*** Xxxx St., Deed recorded in Clay Co OR ###/###). No other relevant prior transfers of this property were found since 1995.

Prior transfer of Sale #2 was a builder purchase of multiple lots with an older house on them (OR ###/###) - there is an additional prior transfer on 12/01/2003 using a Quit Claim Deed that was between relatives. Next newest prior transfer was 1989, again a Quit Claim Deed between relatives.

There are no prior transfers within one year found for Sale #3. Latest prior sale was 12/2000 when it was sold as new construction for $83,500.


2- Accuracy of data in Original Appraisal Report being Reviewed:

NEFAR MLS data was/is available for all sales used as comparables, but does not match the data in the Appraisal Report as the public records data has not yet been updated with the correct information. Win2Data is a compilation by a second party of the County Tax Records and is not truly considered a second source of information for real estate properties and/or transactions. If only the County Tax and Recordings Records and Win2Data (or any other second party source of public records) is used, there is no true second source of verification. MLS data in this market area is considered necessary to competently complete a residential appraisal and serves as a second source of property and sale data outside of contacting either the seller or the buyer of a property to be used as a comparable sale. As the majority of the sales in this market area are handled by a Realtor, MLS data, along with being able to call any Realtors involved in any of these deals, is typically considered a necessary part of the due diligence required to produce a competent residential appraisal and report that is not misleading.

Sale #1: MLS Listing ####: Listed for $90,900 on 01/01/2004 by **** ***** of XXXX, ####. Shows a sale pending the same day, 01/01/2004, listing data shows a proposed construction new house that was finished and closed on 05/11/2004 for $90,900 with an 80% Conventional 1st mortgage. MLS data shows this newly built house as frame construction with vinyl siding, 1,238 GLA, 5 Rooms, 3 Bedrooms, 2 Bathrooms, 2 car attached garage. The site is 67' x 100' and was split off from the larger parcel that included an older small house that fronts on ### Xxxxx Ave. See Clay Co. Deed, OR ###/###. Prior sale of this property, Clay Co. PID ###, was 10/13/03 for $45,000; buyer was a local builder that split this parcel and built a new house now addressed as #### Xxxxxx St and left the older house on a now smaller lot at ### Xxxxx Ave.

Sale #2: MLS Listing ###: Listed for $99,000 on 10/01/2003 by XXX of XXX, ### Shows a sale pending on 01/04/2004, listing data shows a proposed construction new house that was finished and closed on 05/27/2004 for $90,000 with a 92.4% "Rural Housing" 1st mortgage and a $10,000 "SHIP" 2nd mortgage. MLS data shows this newly built house as frame construction, 1,369 GLA, 6 Rooms, 4 Bedrooms, 2 Bathrooms, 2 car attached garage; site is 52.75' x 132' = 7,623 SF. See Clay Co. Deed, OR ###/###. A builder split this parcel from a prior purchase of multiple lots that included an older house that was not part of this sale of this new house. Original parcel Clay Co. PID ###.

Sale #3: MLS Listing ###: Listed for $99,999 on 03/30/2004 by XXXX of XXX, ###. Shows a sale pending on 05/20/2004, closed on 05/28/2004 for $104,000 with an 80% Conventional 1st and a 20% Conventional 2nd mortgage. MLS data shows this house as frame construction, 1,329 GLA, 5 Rooms, 3 Bedrooms, 2 Bathrooms, 2 car attached garage. There are very likely seller concessions that would need to be addressed due to the difference in the listed price to the selling price.

Since there are sales in the City of XXX that would be much more representative of the subject in age, size and amenities, it is the Review Appraiser's Opinion that none of the sales used as comparables in the Appraisal Report being reviewed are appropriate. The information regarding sales #1 and #2 is almost all incorrect which appears to be due to not using local MLS data and not verifying the information. When driving by to take a picture of these properties, it is readily obvious that sales #1 and #2 are not 54 year old structures and are far superior to the subject.

The original Appraisal Report appears to have enough errors to be considered misleading and in violation of multiple USPAP Standards and Ethics Rules. The Review Appraiser strongly suggests the Client send a copy of the Original Appraisal Report and this Review Appraisal Report to the State of Florida Real Estate Appraisal Board for further review.


Subject is a 27 yr old house of 1056 GLA!!!

IMO, if MLS is used for the majority of the residential sales in a market area, it is necessary to belong to the MLS system for the area you are appraising in.

Since the name of the original appraiser is blacked out, I don't know where that appraiser is actually from geographically. My guess is that this is a Certified Appraiser that sent a trainee out do this appraisal in an area where neither that Certified nor the trainee belongs. It's beyond my imagination that any Certified Appraiser, and there was only 1 signature on the report with no mention of anyone else, would do an appraisal like this one. This is a prime example of why NOT to appraise outside of your geographical area without taking the time to do ALL of the due diligence necessary to MAKE yourself geographically competent - and that would include talking to the local Realtors.

I will be trying to find out if the client does send this in to the FREAB. If they don't want to, I will. It will be a little more difficult for the investigator to find out who the original appraiser is, but they can.
__________________
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men/women do nothing.
Fight Back!
Sponsored Links

  #2  
Old 12-21-2004, 09:42 AM
Ray Miller's Avatar
Ray Miller Ray Miller is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Southwest Wisconsin
State: Wisconsin
Professional Status: Licensed Appraiser
Posts: 12,000
Default

Pam,

See that kind of thing out here on reviews all the time.

They have access to the Madison SCWMLS and WIWisconsinMLS that over lap each other. But in many case not that much. Because there are two additional MLS Systems that sit right in the middle of both and have many of the listings. Most of the realtors and real estate offices below to one and maybe two, but not all four nor the ones in IL, IA and Mn. So they are always missing a great deal of information.

Most of the time I needed to use at least two systems to get correct comparables sales, If not three or four systems. That is why I belong to 8 MLS systems. Its not by choice.

Yet when doing reviews, they are trying to put it together with just one system.
  #3  
Old 12-21-2004, 09:46 AM
jeff samolinski jeff samolinski is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Daytona Beach

Posts: 1,642
Default

Skippy does all areas whether he/she has the data or not!!!!!!!!!!!
  #4  
Old 12-21-2004, 09:56 AM
Nancy Wyatt's Avatar
Nancy Wyatt Nancy Wyatt is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Frederick, CO
State: Colorado
Professional Status: Certified Residential Appraiser
Posts: 2,632
Default

Quote:
The original Appraisal Report appears to have enough errors to be considered misleading and in violation of multiple USPAP Standards and Ethics Rules. The Review Appraiser strongly suggests the Client send a copy of the Original Appraisal Report and this Review Appraisal Report to the State of Florida Real Estate Appraisal Board for further review
Pam-

The review companies I work for would probably make me take this out. I have even been asked to remove words such as misleading. Its unfortunate. Through the years, I have learned to craft things in such a way to avoid any of these comments but to get the point across.

The companies I work for simply want the facts regarding the appraisal report. Maybe I'll try to start adding these comments again and see what happens.
  #5  
Old 12-21-2004, 10:20 AM
Otis Key's Avatar
Otis Key Otis Key is offline
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Mile High
State: New Mexico
Professional Status: Certified Residential Appraiser
Posts: 15,970
Default

Nancy - I see what you're saying and understand it well but if, when you, Pam or me, you quote USPAP SR1-1 (B)( c) then there is no way that they can request such a thing and honestly expect any of us who do reviews to abide by the request. We, as reviewer, are also bound by USPAP and therefore a request to ignore or not state a finding which is in violation of USPAP is as much a request to violate USPAP as the person who prepared the original piece of paper.

Quote:
[b]
Standards Rule 1-1

(This Standards Rule contains binding requirements from which departure is
not permitted.)



In developing a real property appraisal, an appraiser must:

<clip>

( b ) not commit a substantial error of omission or commission that significantly affects an appraisal; and

<clip>

( c) not render appraisal services in a careless or negligent manner, such as by making a series of errors that, although individually might not significantly affect the results of an appraisal, in the aggregate affects the credibility of those results.



  #6  
Old 12-21-2004, 10:21 AM
Pamela Crowley (Florida)'s Avatar
Pamela Crowley (Florida) Pamela Crowley (Florida) is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Wherever We Are Parked
State: Florida
Professional Status: Retired Appraiser
Posts: 25,254
Default

Thanks Nancy. I'm thinking about it since I haven't sent this in yet. Just finishing up the little details and double checking it.

Ray, there are areas here where the MLS systems overlap, but this is not one of them. There is only 1 for this little city.

Just read your post Otis. It's staying in.
__________________
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men/women do nothing.
Fight Back!
  #7  
Old 12-21-2004, 11:11 AM
Mister Ed's Avatar
Mister Ed Mister Ed is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Middle Georgia
State: Georgia
Professional Status: Certified Residential Appraiser
Posts: 3,432
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Pamela Crowley (Florida)@Dec 21 2004, 10:20 AM
This is a prime example of why NOT to appraise outside of your geographical area without taking the time to do ALL of the due diligence necessary to MAKE yourself geographically competent - and that would include talking to the local Realtors.
Pamela,

If this one is the one you sooke about in GCS last week, then this is a perfect example of why I dont take any assignments there. My knowledge of GCS is minimal at best. I have turned down many assignments that I did not feel geographical competency up in Jax even thought that is where I was raised because I did not know enough about the area to really do the right job. My commission off the fee versus the potential for writing a report similar to the one you are reviewing are NOT worth the hassles to me.

-ed-
__________________
If crime doesn't pay...
Is working for an AMC a crime?
  #8  
Old 12-21-2004, 11:24 AM
Randy Beigh Randy Beigh is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Spokane,WA

Posts: 3,334
Default

Quote:
It appears the Appraiser did not have access to or utilized MLS data.
Pam

I agree with Nancy. The above sentence is also subjective and confrontational and should be changed or eliminated.

I assume Nancy has been dealing with Max Letendre based on her comments. His method of doing reviews makes the reviews much less subjective and confrontational and will, virtually, wipeout any rebuttal, because you just stick to the facts.

The above sentence adds nothing to your review, but does open the door for the rebuttal.

I assume you are providing the lender with gridded sales you think should have been used.

You have provided evidence to the lender that the appraisal is false and misleading and have done a complete and thorough job. Now, you just want to make sure it doesn't fly back in your face.
  #9  
Old 12-21-2004, 11:35 AM
Nancy Wyatt's Avatar
Nancy Wyatt Nancy Wyatt is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Frederick, CO
State: Colorado
Professional Status: Certified Residential Appraiser
Posts: 2,632
Default

Otis and Pam-

Just to clarify-The reviews companies I do work for feel that these violations are for the client to determine. We are just there to report facts. Remember we are reviewing the report and are not the USPAP police.

The purpose of the appraisal review is to verify the accuracy of the data and conclusions and to determine the reasonableness of the value opinion of the report under review.

We always have the option of sending the report to the state ourselves.

I also want to expand on the conclusion but after having my hand slapped by each review client for this, I don't.


Randy-

Who is Max Letendre? Maybe I need to contact them.
  #10  
Old 12-21-2004, 11:44 AM
Nancy Wyatt's Avatar
Nancy Wyatt Nancy Wyatt is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Frederick, CO
State: Colorado
Professional Status: Certified Residential Appraiser
Posts: 2,632
Default

Pam-

If you do send your comments as they are, let me know if you get "feedback" from your client. I'll be interested to know.
Sponsored Links

Closed Thread


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump




Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
     Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at AppraiserSites.com

Fastest Way to Find a Real Estate Appraiser Enter Zip Code:
Partner Sites:
AppraiserUSA.com - National Appraiser Directory AllDomainsUSA.com - Domain Name Registration
DeadbeatListings.com - Deadbeat ListingsAppraiserSites.com - Web Hosting for the Professional Real Estate Appraiser
Find FHA Appraisers - FHA Appraiser Search Commercial Appraisers - Commercial Appraiser Search
Relocation Appraisal - Find Relocation Appraisers Domain Reseller - Business Opportunity
Home Security Buzz - Home Security Info Radon Testing - Radon Gas Info
My Medicare Forum - Medicare Info Stop Smoking Help - Help Quitting Smoking
CordlessPhoneStore.com - Great Cordless Phones AndroidTabletCity.com - Android Tablet Computers

Follow AppraisersForum.com:          Find us on Facebook            Follow us on Twitter


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:18 AM.

SiteMap: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93