Real Estate Appraisal Forum

appraisersforum.com logo
The Premiere Online Community for Real Estate Appraisers!
 Fastest Way to Find a Real Estate Appraiser Enter Zip Code:
 
 
Go Back   Appraisers Forum > Real Estate Appraisal Forums > General Appraisal Discussion
Register Help Our Rules Calendar Archives Mark Forums Read


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 12-22-2004, 08:03 AM
David R. Stevenson's Avatar
David R. Stevenson David R. Stevenson is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
State: Tennessee
Professional Status: General Public
Posts: 7,155
Default

Doing an REO on a 40 year old home siting on a $75,000 lot.

The home was never built-up high enough to begin with.

Water floods into the garage due to the slope of the land.

Sink hole has been mentioned in MLS data, but can not get any other info.

Home has been there for 40 years. Has a 1/4 inch crack running through a bearing

wall (concrete block). The top of the hill is about 1000 feet above the home.

Cost new to replace home is $180,000 plus (with a correct foundation). Sold for

$125,000 last year. Excellent floor plan - prices of homes around it are $600,000

and up. In an transitional area of superlative location.

Cost to cure site conditions to give the home 30 years of remaining economic life is

$20,000.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Other than full disclosure and disclaimers - I would like to offer the reader of the

report my opinion, subject to: a structure report.

Owners bought the house and have prep it for a redo.

Anybody have experience with poor site conditions and structural problems?

Estimated market value if no problems exist are $175,000 plus

less:$20,000 site conditions

$155,000
__________________
Iíve found if you tuck one part of a pants leg into your sock, people expect less of you.
Sponsored Links

  #2  
Old 12-22-2004, 12:17 PM
Ross (CO) Ross (CO) is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Colorado Springs
State: Colorado
Professional Status: Certified Residential Appraiser
Posts: 4,154
Default

This recent sinkhole story in Florida in the news lately surely must make MANY homeowners a little squeamish. Imagine being in your bed at 2:00 in the the morning, sensing some rumbling, realizing it is not coming from your stomach, and then suddenly your bed is inclined at 45 degrees and your dresser just slid across the floor and crashed right next to your side of the bed.

There is a very useful tool for near-surface geological exploration called ground penetrating radar. It is pulled over the surface on a wheeled dolly, of sorts, and takes a continual reading of the relative density of the earth mass directly below and slightly projected backward as comparison to that last interval over which the unit was just pulled, and allows the operator to create a type of "X-ray" graphic of where there are voids or areas of considerably differing (less) density. These natural sinkholes are very common in many parts of Florida's karst surface materials......and no one really knows exactly when Mother Nature will decide to make that drastic move.

There are certain limitations of just how deep this simple method can "see", but wondering here, if it is part of a builder's or developer's routine to not only do two-dimensional surveying to mark out building lots for new subdivisions but to also probe that 3rd dimension of the near-surface depths under a potential homesite, especially in those locations where the state's Geological Survey department suspects sinkhole potential by nature of the deposits and soils they have identified. Do appraiser's ever "call for" these sorts of engineer's surveys at a property like one might also require the typical home inspector's report ?

David, ...after you mentioned that hill top being "1000 feet above the home" I had to grab my atlas book. Did you mean 100 feet instead ?, as the highest point in the state shows on my map as being 345 feet in the panhandle and near the Alabama border.
  #3  
Old 12-22-2004, 07:26 PM
David R. Stevenson's Avatar
David R. Stevenson David R. Stevenson is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
State: Tennessee
Professional Status: General Public
Posts: 7,155
Default

Ross,

No, what I meant to say was that the top of the hill is about a 1,000 ft East of the

subject property. The top of that hill may be 10 feet higher than the subject tract.

The subject property is about 2 miles away from the Devils' Millhopper. THe Devils

Millhopper is a giant sinkhole maybe a 100 feet deep with a hole circumference at

the top of only 5 acres or so.

THe garage on the subject was put on the wrong side of the house against the

slope. Garage acts like a water scoop. They should have put the garage on as a

side load on the opposite end near the lowest point of the house footprint (work

with the land - not against it). All those hurricanes we had created a lot of water

sheet flow on the top of that hill and brought it down to the subject lot. The subject

lot and another lot have small sink holes which filled up with water during these

storms. I am now figuring new retail for the subject lot to be $200,000 with a

1,900 sf living area home, 2,600 under roof. Its got an old - airstrip adjacent to it

and is surrounded by old larger land holders with much bigger homes - a house is

being built at the top of that hill I was talking about - looks like about 10,000

square feet of living area.
__________________
Iíve found if you tuck one part of a pants leg into your sock, people expect less of you.
  #4  
Old 12-23-2004, 09:06 AM
David R. Stevenson's Avatar
David R. Stevenson David R. Stevenson is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
State: Tennessee
Professional Status: General Public
Posts: 7,155
Default

Ross,

Or anyone who knows .... these small "Florida valleys" - I call them ..... are they

the result of karst? It very hilly here in the Gainesville, FL area - these valleys

have had thier limestone desolved? - we have a lot of under-water caves here that

are so vast - their entire expanse beyond the reach of manned diving operations.

Be nice if they could send down a deeper probe.
__________________
Iíve found if you tuck one part of a pants leg into your sock, people expect less of you.

Last edited by David R. Stevenson : 05-08-2006 at 01:41 PM.
  #5  
Old 12-23-2004, 09:11 AM
David R. Stevenson's Avatar
David R. Stevenson David R. Stevenson is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
State: Tennessee
Professional Status: General Public
Posts: 7,155
Default

Here is the right photo .... of the valley - grand-daddy land .... owned by older

gentlemen (Southerners) ....
__________________
Iíve found if you tuck one part of a pants leg into your sock, people expect less of you.

Last edited by David R. Stevenson : 05-08-2006 at 01:41 PM.
Sponsored Links

Closed Thread


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump




Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
     Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at AppraiserSites.com

Fastest Way to Find a Real Estate Appraiser Enter Zip Code:
Partner Sites:
AppraiserUSA.com - National Appraiser Directory AllDomainsUSA.com - Domain Name Registration
DeadbeatListings.com - Deadbeat ListingsAppraiserSites.com - Web Hosting for the Professional Real Estate Appraiser
Find FHA Appraisers - FHA Appraiser Search Commercial Appraisers - Commercial Appraiser Search
Relocation Appraisal - Find Relocation Appraisers Domain Reseller - Business Opportunity
Home Security Buzz - Home Security Info Radon Testing - Radon Gas Info
My Medicare Forum - Medicare Info Stop Smoking Help - Help Quitting Smoking
CordlessPhoneStore.com - Great Cordless Phones AndroidTabletCity.com - Android Tablet Computers

Follow AppraisersForum.com:          Find us on Facebook            Follow us on Twitter


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:32 PM.

SiteMap: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93