Real Estate Appraisal Forum

appraisersforum.com logo
The Premiere Online Community for Real Estate Appraisers!
 Fastest Way to Find a Real Estate Appraiser Enter Zip Code:
 
 
Go Back   Appraisers Forum > Real Estate Appraisal Forums > General Appraisal Discussion
Register Help Our Rules Calendar Archives Mark Forums Read


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 07-26-2005, 07:27 AM
James Sturm James Sturm is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Pinal County, AZ
State: Arizona
Professional Status: Certified Residential Appraiser
Posts: 509
Default

Been sitting on an appraisal assigment for over one month. Initial research found the subject property having encroachments on one of the city's lots (west suburb of Chicago).Therefore, the assigment was put on delay. Spoke with building department who stated the city would not permit the property to sell with the encroachment. The subject site had (3) tax identification numbers. The subject site was improved with a duplexed income property on two parcels (small sites) and the garage being on the additional parel. According to the city and a survey supplied to me by the city, the encroachments were a driveway, one entry for the subject building, and the garage.

A simple cure was found by the seller purchasing the two adjacent lots to the south of the subject site (cost of the two sites was less than the cure for the encroachments). According to the client, these lots were purchased by the seller and have closed. My gut tells me that this assignment is two appraisal assignments: one for the improved parcel and one for the two adjacent vacant properties. I am still awaiting for instructions on how to proceed with this assignment. If this assignment is for two appraisals, should the vacant parcel (50 ft site) be subdivided to eliminate the current encroachments adjacent to the north? Any sugguestions would greatly be appreciated.
Sponsored Links

  #2  
Old 07-26-2005, 07:43 AM
Bill_FL's Avatar
Bill_FL Bill_FL is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cliqueville
State: Florida
Professional Status: Certified General Appraiser
Posts: 4,871
Default

Well, first, are the two lots buildable?

Second, is not the transerfability of the improvements dependent on the recently purchased lots? Why do two appraisals?

Third--If I am the owner, I imediately get these properties re-recorded as 1.
__________________
Warning: this post not spell checked because I know what I meant to type.
Loud Pipes Save Lives
  #3  
Old 07-26-2005, 08:15 AM
James Sturm James Sturm is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Pinal County, AZ
State: Arizona
Professional Status: Certified Residential Appraiser
Posts: 509
Default

The site purchased to the south of the subject site was a 50' x 131' foot site. The garage was located at the rear south of the site purchased. Zoning restrictions are 4,950 sq ft with a minimum width requirement of 39.5 feet. Wondering how long it would take the seller to combine the site into one site? I like your suggestion.
  #4  
Old 07-26-2005, 09:17 AM
Jo Ann Meyer Stratton's Avatar
Jo Ann Meyer Stratton Jo Ann Meyer Stratton is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Safford, Arizona
State: Arizona
Professional Status: Certified Residential Appraiser
Posts: 6,328
Default

If the highest and best use site would be all the lots--then that is what you would include in your appraisal report. Separate assessor's parcel numbers are only a bookkeeping function for taxation purposes and have nothing to do with how a property can be encumbered for mortgage purposes. And the recorded deed for the mortgage lien can have as many legal descriptions as the parties want encumbered by that mortgage.

So are the vacant lots buildable on their own? Do the existing lots required the vacant parcels to enable them to have a highest and best use? It sounds like the vacant lots are necessary for the improved lots to have adequate parking, solve easement and encroachment issues, etc. If that is the case, a single appraisal assignment and report that includes all lots and all improvements. Show in your report all assessor's parcel numbers and legal descriptions involved that create a site that would be economic, legal, physical entity. then it would be up to the lender to have the appropriate legal descriptions on their recorded documents. Unless there is some bookkeeping function the assessor or planning and zoning department requires--the owner doesn't have to do anything--they already own the lots. Sites that have been platted and identified on a recorded subdivision map cannot be changed, the individual lot numbers remain forever. But one person can own one lot or hundreds of lots in a subdivision and the legal description does not change.
__________________
Jo Ann Meyer Stratton, IFA, SRA
Sponsored Links

Closed Thread


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump




Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
     Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at AppraiserSites.com

Fastest Way to Find a Real Estate Appraiser Enter Zip Code:
Partner Sites:
AppraiserUSA.com - National Appraiser Directory AllDomainsUSA.com - Domain Name Registration
DeadbeatListings.com - Deadbeat ListingsAppraiserSites.com - Web Hosting for the Professional Real Estate Appraiser
Find FHA Appraisers - FHA Appraiser Search Commercial Appraisers - Commercial Appraiser Search
Relocation Appraisal - Find Relocation Appraisers Domain Reseller - Business Opportunity
Home Security Buzz - Home Security Info Radon Testing - Radon Gas Info
My Medicare Forum - Medicare Info Stop Smoking Help - Help Quitting Smoking
CordlessPhoneStore.com - Great Cordless Phones AndroidTabletCity.com - Android Tablet Computers

Follow AppraisersForum.com:          Find us on Facebook            Follow us on Twitter


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:52 PM.

SiteMap: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93