Hank Outlaw
Member
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2002
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- North Carolina
Hello,
I have searched for threads on ceiling height, but did not see anything exactly like this.
I am appraising an older two-story sidehall with 6.7' ceilings on the 2nd level (2 bedrooms, 1 bath up, 1 bedroom, living rm, eat-in kitchen and no bath(s) down). The total heated living area - including the 2nd level is 1075 sq. feet. If the 2nd level is not counted in the GLA, the 1st level GLA is 695 sq. feet. (house is only 16.2' wide)
I cannot confirm if this is the only house around with 6.7'+- ceilings. I have called the agents that listed or sold the comparables in the neighborhood and they could not recall if ceiling height was an issue. I'm wondering if they even noticed. So, my question is, if 7' is the absolute cut-off, how to address the 2nd level relative to GLA, since it is within 3/10s of the standard. I would imagine that for competing homes in the subject's market, there would not be as much negative impact (homes in the $10,000 to $70,000 range vs. homes of better quality and condition in the $100,000 range), i.e., low income housing and govt. subsidized rental properties.
Any advice or observations are welcome.
Thanks,
Hank
I have searched for threads on ceiling height, but did not see anything exactly like this.
I am appraising an older two-story sidehall with 6.7' ceilings on the 2nd level (2 bedrooms, 1 bath up, 1 bedroom, living rm, eat-in kitchen and no bath(s) down). The total heated living area - including the 2nd level is 1075 sq. feet. If the 2nd level is not counted in the GLA, the 1st level GLA is 695 sq. feet. (house is only 16.2' wide)
I cannot confirm if this is the only house around with 6.7'+- ceilings. I have called the agents that listed or sold the comparables in the neighborhood and they could not recall if ceiling height was an issue. I'm wondering if they even noticed. So, my question is, if 7' is the absolute cut-off, how to address the 2nd level relative to GLA, since it is within 3/10s of the standard. I would imagine that for competing homes in the subject's market, there would not be as much negative impact (homes in the $10,000 to $70,000 range vs. homes of better quality and condition in the $100,000 range), i.e., low income housing and govt. subsidized rental properties.
Any advice or observations are welcome.
Thanks,
Hank