Jimmy L Kim
Freshman Member
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2006
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- California
I did a FHA appraisal on a bank owned property about a month ago. Purchase price was $384K and I came in at $355K. For the first couple of weeks the MB was calling to see if there was an "wiggle?" room. I told him nicely that what it is is what it is. Well, I got a call from the same MB today to let me know that they found another appraiser to do the appraisal and he came in at purchase price(it even passed Landsafe review). So I told them to email me a copy if he had one.
Well, I just saw the copy and I think the report is misleading(in my opinion). I just saw the first two comps and I didn't need to look any further. Sale 1 is on the same block and it was pending the time of my report and reason why I didn't use it(noted in my report) was because the garage was converted to a living area with permit(verified with the listing agent and LADBS website). So, this sale was appx 450 SF larger than subject(subject is appx 1,500 SF) and in much superior condition. Also, it had been pending since Feb and closed couple of weeks ago. No time adjustment(I've always thought that time adjustments were made from the pending date, not from the closing date) and no adjustment for 3% NRCC.
Sale 2 was pending at the time of my inspection and from my notes from the interview with the listing agent, overall condition was similar. Just minor cosmetic issues. But on the new report, it's noted as "inferior" and $20K adjustment was made. And again, no adjustment for NRCC of 3% and no time adjustment. I mean subject is in a market where REOs and short sales dominate. At the time of my report, in the overall market area there were total of 554 active and pending sales of which 311 were either REOs or short sales.
Another thing that gets me is that this is FHA purchase and there are no repairs or conditions noted. Among other things, in one of the subject's bathrooms, there was mold on the ceiling and under the sink. You'd have be blind not to notice. Water heater was not properly braced and etc...
Another funny thing, adjusted sale prices for 3 closed and 2 active sales were from $385,500 to $442,000 and the guy came in at $385K.
And I get the blame for coming in too low... great way to start the weekend...
Well, I just saw the copy and I think the report is misleading(in my opinion). I just saw the first two comps and I didn't need to look any further. Sale 1 is on the same block and it was pending the time of my report and reason why I didn't use it(noted in my report) was because the garage was converted to a living area with permit(verified with the listing agent and LADBS website). So, this sale was appx 450 SF larger than subject(subject is appx 1,500 SF) and in much superior condition. Also, it had been pending since Feb and closed couple of weeks ago. No time adjustment(I've always thought that time adjustments were made from the pending date, not from the closing date) and no adjustment for 3% NRCC.
Sale 2 was pending at the time of my inspection and from my notes from the interview with the listing agent, overall condition was similar. Just minor cosmetic issues. But on the new report, it's noted as "inferior" and $20K adjustment was made. And again, no adjustment for NRCC of 3% and no time adjustment. I mean subject is in a market where REOs and short sales dominate. At the time of my report, in the overall market area there were total of 554 active and pending sales of which 311 were either REOs or short sales.
Another thing that gets me is that this is FHA purchase and there are no repairs or conditions noted. Among other things, in one of the subject's bathrooms, there was mold on the ceiling and under the sink. You'd have be blind not to notice. Water heater was not properly braced and etc...
Another funny thing, adjusted sale prices for 3 closed and 2 active sales were from $385,500 to $442,000 and the guy came in at $385K.
And I get the blame for coming in too low... great way to start the weekend...
