Appraisal for a refi; subject sold within past 12 months; verified details of sale; used as Comp #1 - no adjustments and no increase in value over the sale price.
Underwiter calls and says I can't use subject as comp. This came as suprise to me as I've done it on several occasions, including a couple of very high-end homes. No one has ever complained before. In fact, one reviewer called just to complement the way I handled some post-sale improvements to the subject. I may have been a bit testy :evil: by the time I asked the underwriter to refer to the section of USPAP or FNMA guidelines prohibiting the use of the best comp available.
I guess I should have double-checked the texts before asking such a question , but I still can't find any rule / law / suggestion against using the best comp available, even if it is the subject itself.
Is there such a rule? Has anyone had similar questions from the UW? Suggestions?
Underwiter calls and says I can't use subject as comp. This came as suprise to me as I've done it on several occasions, including a couple of very high-end homes. No one has ever complained before. In fact, one reviewer called just to complement the way I handled some post-sale improvements to the subject. I may have been a bit testy :evil: by the time I asked the underwriter to refer to the section of USPAP or FNMA guidelines prohibiting the use of the best comp available.
I guess I should have double-checked the texts before asking such a question , but I still can't find any rule / law / suggestion against using the best comp available, even if it is the subject itself.
Is there such a rule? Has anyone had similar questions from the UW? Suggestions?