ZZGAMAZZ
Elite Member
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2007
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- California
The subject is a duplex with rent control guidelines in LA.
The owner collects a extra $300 per month because the girlfriend of the designated "legal" tenant moved in recently.
The extra $300 would appear to reflect "market reaction" above-and-beyond the controlled rent of $400 per month, based upon a very long term tenant.
Would y'all include the additional--probably illegal--rental income in determining the subject's actual rent?
(I figure this issue might invoke the ultimate debate between "market reaction" and "legally permissible" camps.)
The owner collects a extra $300 per month because the girlfriend of the designated "legal" tenant moved in recently.
The extra $300 would appear to reflect "market reaction" above-and-beyond the controlled rent of $400 per month, based upon a very long term tenant.
Would y'all include the additional--probably illegal--rental income in determining the subject's actual rent?
(I figure this issue might invoke the ultimate debate between "market reaction" and "legally permissible" camps.)
Last edited: