Poll - How Likely Are You To Retire Before Implementation Of The Uad 3.6 Abomination?

[J Grant]

Here's the link: https://www.aivre.com/login

It's free to try, J. Let me know what you think once you've actually tried it - and not just solicited opinions from AI and the fools (me included) who reside here on the forum.

If I try it, I should I behave like you did - not answer any questions about it?

 

[George Hatch]

It seems unlikely that their system will lock any data in that the appraiser cannot manually override. Comp selection included.

 

[alebrewer]

If I try it, I should I behave like you did - not answer any questions about it?

You should encourage others to experience what they want or don't want - and not rely on AI or other fools on AF to guide them.

 

[J Grant]

It seems unlikely that their system will lock any data in that the appraiser cannot manually override. Comp selection included.

So what? Why would a churn and burn appraiser want to override comp selection or other features that do the work?


Letting the AI do the work is what the company uses to promise to "Save 3 hours" off the time it takes to do a report. Letting AI select comps and determine Q and C ratings is how staff appraisers can pump out enough volume to survive in an AMC job with production quotas, which will ramp up when PDR collectors do the inspections- or how fee apprasiers can bid low enough to get orders.

The next logical step is for the GSEs to conclude there is no additional risk to letting a "trained data analyst" perform the same function of using the AI software instead of an appraiser. They will do an internal study to prove it.

That is how they influxed a flood of non-appraisers to do the inspection.

 

[chad hampton]

I’m pretty sure Bradford is coming out with something that will be as good as anything in the industry from what I’ve been reading. I’d be willing to give AIVRE a shot, but I will not support anyone who utilizes restB.AI. I’ve heard that guy speak several times and he comes across as a very unlikable individual. Just not something I can support. I’m not sure what his role is in that company, but I would keep him out of the public eye as much as possible.

 

[Alsie35]

Meanwhile, Blissful RETIREMENT is holding a SOLID 54.8% - 45.2% LEAD over "The UAD 3.6 Abomination". You may now return to your "Thread Hijacking", O "Blocked Ones" ...

 

[George Hatch]

So what? Why would a churn and burn appraiser want to override comp selection or other features that do the work?


Letting the AI do the work is what the company uses to promise to "Save 3 hours" off the time it takes to do a report. Letting AI select comps and determine Q and C ratings is how staff appraisers can pump out enough volume to survive in an AMC job with production quotas, which will ramp up when PDR collectors do the inspections- or how fee apprasiers can bid low enough to get orders.

The next logical step is for the GSEs to conclude there is no additional risk to letting a "trained data analyst" perform the same function of using the AI software instead of an appraiser. They will do an internal study to prove it.

That is how they influxed a flood of non-appraisers to do the inspection.

You appear to be following the general gist of their reasoning. They clearly intend to leverage the technology to their benefit regardless of the economic impact on the appraisers. If the appraisers can find a way to thrive in that environment then that's not going to bother them but at the same time they're not going to be making any compromises on behalf of the appraisers.

----------------
As an aside and from the user perspective, one advantage to involving more automation to the process of rating quality and condition is the consistency factor. The box will use a single benchmark for those ratings, and even if that benchmark is flawed the outcome will still be consistent from one appraiser to the next. More consistent, anyway. That consistency is a quality of its own.

 

[Alsie35]

I’m pretty sure Bradford is coming out with something that will be as good as anything in the industry from what I’ve been reading. I’d be willing to give AIVRE a shot, but I will not support anyone who utilizes restB.AI. I’ve heard that guy speak several times and he comes across as a very unlikable individual. Just not something I can support. I’m not sure what his role is in that company, but I would keep him out of the public eye as much as possible.

So - you're gonna use the software that will:

"CREATE THE XML FILE FIRST BEFORE THE REPORT!!!!!!!!",

shilled by a shrieking lunatic who sounds like he's on CRACK?

That Bradford video narrator can cause a cow herd to stampede four counties over .... HMMMMM ....

 

[J Grant]

from their own info-
An appraisal technology start-up has teamed with an AI-powered computer vision company to substantially cut the time it takes to prepare valuation reports. How does three hours grab you?

In a new case study, Aivre claims the collaboration with Restb.AI saves appraisers an extra 180 minutes, enough time to double the number of valuations appraisals can complete in a single day. Restb.AI operates in the field of computer vision, in which it extracts data from photographs in the real estate and mortgage sectors.

Manual work has long slowed down appraisers. But Aivre’s Jake Lew, co-founder and CEO of the fast growing Michigan-based software company, says the addition of Restb.AI’s technology frees appraisers from repetitive tasks by either partially or fully integrating several time-consuming steps.

From photographs of the subject property, the technology extracts and classifies key property characteristics. It also generates condition and quality scores for the subject property as well as comparable ones, and auto-populates GSE-compliant forms — all without manually inputting or verifying the data.

 

[J Grant]

You appear to be following the general gist of their reasoning. They clearly intend to leverage the technology to their benefit regardless of the economic impact on the appraisers. If the appraisers can find a way to thrive in that environment then that's not going to bother them but at the same time they're not going to be making any compromises on behalf of the appraisers.

----------------
As an aside and from the user perspective, one advantage to involving more automation to the process of rating quality and condition is the consistency factor. The box will use a single benchmark for those ratings, and even if that benchmark is flawed the outcome will still be consistent from one appraiser to the next. More consistent, anyway. That consistency is a quality of its own.

Perhaps the AI consistency will soon take away your job.

Buyers do not look for consistency. Buyers look for , and value, the indidual features of a property But who cares how buyers in the market behave? Conistency to replace judgement is a way to pump out volume from appraisers and then the next step will be to take the appraiser out of the equation.

You have been consistent at jumping in to rataionize every action that minimizes the appraiser's role , I will give you that !