johnfu
Freshman Member
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2003
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- California
Hi,
I was doing an review for a purchase. The purchase price is $560,000 and the appraisal has an estimate value of $1,200,000. The property has been on the market for 980 days.
I did an research and found out that the subject property is a "nonconfoming" property and the original appraisal stated it is "legal" zoning and all the comparables in the original appraisal report were all "legal" zoning properties.
I disagree with the value in the original report but I wasn't able to provide comparables to support my opinion of value since there has been no sales of similar condition properties in the neighborhood.
I gave a value of $560,000 as my opinion of value in the review and it was based on the market reaction to the subject property since it was listed for almost 3 years and the value was not recognized by the market until recently.
Am I did the right thing? Or is there any other way to do this?
I appreciate all comments.
I was doing an review for a purchase. The purchase price is $560,000 and the appraisal has an estimate value of $1,200,000. The property has been on the market for 980 days.
I did an research and found out that the subject property is a "nonconfoming" property and the original appraisal stated it is "legal" zoning and all the comparables in the original appraisal report were all "legal" zoning properties.
I disagree with the value in the original report but I wasn't able to provide comparables to support my opinion of value since there has been no sales of similar condition properties in the neighborhood.
I gave a value of $560,000 as my opinion of value in the review and it was based on the market reaction to the subject property since it was listed for almost 3 years and the value was not recognized by the market until recently.
Am I did the right thing? Or is there any other way to do this?
I appreciate all comments.