Since so many have been interested in my opinion on this question, here it is:
I believe that state investigations SHOULD be done under STD-3, WHEN a licensed/certified appraiser is engaged to do one.
Certain investigatory functions do NOT require an appraiser. For example, an appraiser uses a comp in a report. Pretty much anyone could drive by it, pull out the MLS page(s), and get the assessor's data, and turn it over to the board.
An unlicensed appraiser does an appraisal for a FRT or in a mandatory state. Don't need an appraiser to review it to know he/she broke the law.
I say that states should not have to order a STD-3 review at every stage of an investigation; however, IF, after a FORMAL hearing, the state wishes to pursue the case and actually DO a review on the appraisal, then it should certainly conform to STD-3- and every other requirement under USPAP and applicable state laws.
I am told that Illinois will be incorporating this into their new admin rules- in its revised version.
Brad Ellis, IFA,RAA
I believe that state investigations SHOULD be done under STD-3, WHEN a licensed/certified appraiser is engaged to do one.
Certain investigatory functions do NOT require an appraiser. For example, an appraiser uses a comp in a report. Pretty much anyone could drive by it, pull out the MLS page(s), and get the assessor's data, and turn it over to the board.
An unlicensed appraiser does an appraisal for a FRT or in a mandatory state. Don't need an appraiser to review it to know he/she broke the law.
I say that states should not have to order a STD-3 review at every stage of an investigation; however, IF, after a FORMAL hearing, the state wishes to pursue the case and actually DO a review on the appraisal, then it should certainly conform to STD-3- and every other requirement under USPAP and applicable state laws.
I am told that Illinois will be incorporating this into their new admin rules- in its revised version.
Brad Ellis, IFA,RAA