Would a 'subject to' report be exempted from this statement?
line 293-294 USPAP -"(5) the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the appraiser's opinions and specific to the assignments purpose. "
What if you contracted a fee based upon a hypothetical and that if the findings were less than thought possible(house is falling down), would you take LESS(lets say a trip fee), and if it was possible you would then complete the assginment and collect the original greater fee?
Would this be considered an assignment under SR4, Utilizing elements of SR1 possibly transitioning to SR2, hoping all along that another D3P was not contracted to conduct all the elements of SR3 againts you!
I think the short answer to your question is, YES! However, you have identified the most convoluted passage in the document.Does USPAP allow an appraiser to accept an assignment where his or her compensation is contingent upon a future event or act?