- Joined
- Jan 6, 2010
- Professional Status
- Certified General Appraiser
- State
- Dom. Republic
I agree. To me, pendings are an indicator of future value, not current values. If a few of these pendings actually close, then I will use them as comps.
I will not use pendings to support a $50,000 one month time adjustment based on pendings. We did that in 2008, because FNMA said we could, then they blamed us when the market crashed, because these pending were crashing, and not closing. Builders were offering $100,000 discounts, because 50% of their sales backed out and they were stuck with 50% of extra inventory. The other 50% of buyers that went ahead with their purchases, got high appraisals based on pendings and after closing, they saw the exact same model get a $100,000 builder discount 1 month later.
If I was doing a review of an apprqaisal after the crash, I would not agree with an appraial based the value on based pendings, especially if they never closed due to falling market.
I will not use pendings to support a $50,000 one month time adjustment based on pendings. We did that in 2008, because FNMA said we could, then they blamed us when the market crashed, because these pending were crashing, and not closing. Builders were offering $100,000 discounts, because 50% of their sales backed out and they were stuck with 50% of extra inventory. The other 50% of buyers that went ahead with their purchases, got high appraisals based on pendings and after closing, they saw the exact same model get a $100,000 builder discount 1 month later.
If I was doing a review of an apprqaisal after the crash, I would not agree with an appraial based the value on based pendings, especially if they never closed due to falling market.