HUD Investigation Leads to Illegal Break-In & Evidence Tampering

[Mejappz]

Over the past four years, I have been subjected to a relentless, unjust investigation by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) – not because of any wrongdoing on my part, but simply for conducting an honest, independent real estate appraisal. What began as a false racial discrimination claim by a disgruntled homeowner has now escalated into a coordinated effort to suppress evidence, manipulate legal records, and intimidate me into silence.

New Developments in My Case:

• • Office Break-In & Missing Files:
    Recently, my office was unlawfully entered, and critical documents were stolen from my hard-copy files. Simultaneously, my computer files—containing official HUD correspondence—were either deleted or replaced with altered PDFs. Notably, a certified letter originally detailing a second charge of “Coercion” is now missing that key allegation; the only change on the revised document is the removal of that charge”.
  • Forensic Analysis Indicates Tampering:
    Preliminary forensic metadata analysis shows inconsistencies in modification dates and document processing. The evidence suggests that someone reprocessed these files—possibly through external software or on my personal computer—to erase traces of the “Coercion” charge. These alterations may be part of a broader effort to suppress exculpatory evidence.
  • Police Report Filed:
    I have filed a police report documenting the break-in and theft of federal legal documents. I have also sent this report along with copies of both the original certified letter and the altered versions to HUD’s main office and the “Office of Investigation” (OIG) at HUD. My intent is clear: if the documents are not properly logged in HUD’s Teapots system, it will stand as evidence of intentional suppression.
  • New Actions Taken:
    Since my last update, I have escalated my efforts by:
    
    
    • Contacting multiple Senators and House Representatives (including Rand Paul and Josh Hawley, Adam Shiff etc.) to demand a full congressional investigation into HUD’s investigative practices.
    • Filing further complaints with HUD’s Office of Inspector General and the HUD whistleblower hotline.
    • Submitting Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests for all internal communications related to my case.
    • Reaching out to the Department of Justice, the General Accounting Office, Office of Budget Management, the FBI and media outlets to ensure that these irregularities receive national attention.
    • Gathering testimonies from numerous fellow appraisers, many of whom report similar prolonged investigations—even after being cleared by state appraisal boards and other government agencies.

https://appraisersblogs.com/HUD-investigation-leads-to-illegal-break-in-n-evidence-tampering/

 

[Mejappz]

HUD and the GSEs are US equivalent of Cheka.

 

[Sadie]

Over the past four years, I have been subjected to a relentless, unjust investigation by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) – not because of any wrongdoing on my part, but simply for conducting an honest, independent real estate appraisal. What began as a false racial discrimination claim by a disgruntled homeowner has now escalated into a coordinated effort to suppress evidence, manipulate legal records, and intimidate me into silence.

New Developments in My Case:

• • Office Break-In & Missing Files:
    Recently, my office was unlawfully entered, and critical documents were stolen from my hard-copy files. Simultaneously, my computer files—containing official HUD correspondence—were either deleted or replaced with altered PDFs. Notably, a certified letter originally detailing a second charge of “Coercion” is now missing that key allegation; the only change on the revised document is the removal of that charge”.
  • Forensic Analysis Indicates Tampering:
    Preliminary forensic metadata analysis shows inconsistencies in modification dates and document processing. The evidence suggests that someone reprocessed these files—possibly through external software or on my personal computer—to erase traces of the “Coercion” charge. These alterations may be part of a broader effort to suppress exculpatory evidence.
  • Police Report Filed:
    I have filed a police report documenting the break-in and theft of federal legal documents. I have also sent this report along with copies of both the original certified letter and the altered versions to HUD’s main office and the “Office of Investigation” (OIG) at HUD. My intent is clear: if the documents are not properly logged in HUD’s Teapots system, it will stand as evidence of intentional suppression.
  • New Actions Taken:
    Since my last update, I have escalated my efforts by:
    
    • Contacting multiple Senators and House Representatives (including Rand Paul and Josh Hawley, Adam Shiff etc.) to demand a full congressional investigation into HUD’s investigative practices.
    • Filing further complaints with HUD’s Office of Inspector General and the HUD whistleblower hotline.
    • Submitting Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests for all internal communications related to my case.
    • Reaching out to the Department of Justice, the General Accounting Office, Office of Budget Management, the FBI and media outlets to ensure that these irregularities receive national attention.
    • Gathering testimonies from numerous fellow appraisers, many of whom report similar prolonged investigations—even after being cleared by state appraisal boards and other government agencies.

https://appraisersblogs.com/HUD-investigation-leads-to-illegal-break-in-n-evidence-tampering/

This creeps me out. Do you have a separate location for your office? or is it a home office? Who else is involved with the lawsuit? Could it be someone other than HUD? I guess from now on you need a double secret place to store your files. Aren't you glad you had back ups? And I mean no offence to you, but don't you think this is excessive? As in doesn't HUD have better things to do with their time and money than to hire burglers to raid appraiser's offices?

 

[RustyTapeMeasure]

Holy F, I am so sorry for your predicament and situation. Insane, scary, stressful and just plain dirty. The big machine is dirty and crooked. I wish you the best and if this was in a bar and me sitting next to you, I'd have your back and go out swinging too. When I was appraising ( decided to just quit 2-3 years ago) I was lucky and made some pre-emptive decisions on how, what type of loans I would appraise for a defensive mechanism moving forward when I was threatened to HIT a value on some appraisals while I was at the inspections, so needless to say, I did not complete the work/orders and enacted my defense and turned down certain refi's and especially cash out refi's. Months after this defense was put in, insanely I was 'offered' via two different lenders on two different properties BUT the same buyer and that buyer was Patrisse Cullors. I knew the name immediately and declined. One was a house in Topanga Canyon and another bigger house in the Valley on Laurel Canyon I seem to remember. I wish you the best in your fight. It's nuts enough to defend on the racist discrimination stuff but all this extra is mind blowing.

 

[sputnam]

Another lesson for everyone. Off site backups of everything. Even if you don't have an office break in... stuff happens.

 

[Terrel L. Shields]

Another lesson for everyone.

Second lesson. Don't do business with FHA nor FNMA et al.

 

[Mile High Trout]

Another lesson for everyone. Off site backups of everything. Even if you don't have an office break in... stuff happens.

That appraiser did that. And that's why they're busted red handed. Unless office files magically adulterate themselves and change vital content recommendations from official federal HUD investigators.
__________________________________________________________

Ken posted a follow up as well.
___________________________________________________________

Author: Kenneth Mullinix

Comment:
Empowering Appraisers: Leveraging AI and HUD Guidelines to Uphold Professional Integrity
By Kenneth J. Mullinix

In recent years, appraisers have faced increasing scrutiny from agencies like the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). While oversight is essential, there are growing concerns about investigations that disregard established protocols, leading to prolonged and unwarranted scrutiny. However, by harnessing advanced tools like ChatGPT and understanding HUD's guidelines, appraisers can effectively defend their practices and ensure fair treatment.

The Accardi Doctrine: Agencies Must Follow Their Own Rules

A cornerstone of administrative law is the Accardi Doctrine, established by the Supreme Court in United States ex rel. Accardi v. Shaughnessy, 347 U.S. 260 (1954). This doctrine mandates that federal agencies are obligated to follow their own regulations, policies, and procedures. Failure to do so can result in their actions being invalidated if challenged in court. This principle empowers appraisers to hold agencies accountable, ensuring that any investigation adheres
strictly to established guidelines.en.wikipedia.org+1en.wikipedia.org+1

HUD's Single Family Housing Policy Handbook 4000.1: A Tool for Defense

HUD's Single Family Housing Policy Handbook 4000.1 outlines the procedures and standards for appraisals and related investigations. Familiarity with this handbook allows appraisers to identify any deviations from prescribed protocols during an investigation. For instance, if HUD initiates an investigation without proper notification or fails to provide clear reasons for the inquiry, these actions may violate their own guidelines, rendering the investigation procedural flawed.

Leveraging AI: A Modern Approach to Ensure Compliance

The advent of artificial intelligence offers appraisers a powerful ally. By inputting case documents, correspondence, and relevant files into AI platforms like ChatGPT, appraisers can analyze the investigation's adherence to HUD's guidelines. The AI can cross-reference the actions taken against the procedures outlined in the handbook, highlighting discrepancies or procedural missteps.

Example Prompt for ChatGPT:

"Analyze the attached investigation documents and identify any deviations from the procedures outlined in HUD's Single Family Housing Policy Handbook 4000.1."

This approach provides a detailed, objective analysis that can be instrumental in defending against unjust investigations.

Case Law Supporting Procedural Adherence

The importance of agencies following their own procedures is further reinforced by cases like Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402 (1971). In this landmark decision, the Supreme Court emphasized the necessity for agencies to adhere to statutory requirements and established procedures, underscoring that failure to do so can lead to judicial invalidation of their actions.en.wikipedia.org+1en.wikipedia.org+1

Actionable Steps for Appraisers
1. Educate Yourself: Familiarize yourself with HUD's Single Family Housing Policy Handbook 4000.1 and other relevant guidelines.
2. Document Everything: Maintain meticulous records of all communications and actions related to any investigation.
3. Utilize AI Tools: Leverage platforms like ChatGPT to analyze investigation procedures against established guidelines.
4. Consult Legal Counsel: If discrepancies are identified, seek legal advice to challenge any procedural violations effectively.

By proactively engaging with available resources and technologies, appraisers can ensure that investigations are conducted fairly and in accordance with established protocols, thereby safeguarding their professional integrity.

 

[Fritz in NY]

AI is NOT a powerful ally. It is our detriment. Every house is different, every hood is different, every lending environment, every market, every SOW and lender is different, every alternative option. It can't be science, they want it to be but NOT.

 

[Mile High Trout]

AI is NOT a powerful ally. It is our detriment. Every house is different, every hood is different, every lending environment, every market, every SOW and lender is different, every alternative option. It can't be science, they want it to be but NOT.

Agreed. What is remarkable about this story is the appraiser feels differently. And I'll be, the AI systems appear to have brought forth some meaningful reference and been of legitimate help.

I'd never turn to AI for that sort of assistance personally. But this appraiser did. Sort of a case study and one of the first real world examples of an appraiser doing so. At least publicly.