• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

Practice The Neglected Art Of Verification And Due Diligence

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mike Kennedy

Elite Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2003
Professional Status
Certified Residential Appraiser
State
New York
Though focused on Commercial RE, the same elements apply to Residential

See:

"1. What is the appraiser’s responsibility?
2. Legal Precedents
3. Deceptive purchase agreements
4. Misrepresentation of property characteristics

There are a host of unfavorable property conditions that can be misrepresented by property owners, such as:
Legality of use. An illegal use, a use contrary to zoning laws or building and safety codes, can be discovered by local authorities, who might then force the landlord to remove the improvement and/or pay for conversion of the space back to legal use. This can often lead to loan losses for lenders, particularly with multifamily properties.

The drive to perform appraisals faster has caused some appraisers to skip the task of verifying that the existing improvements are permitted by the appropriate city or governing authority, which is easily verified on-line, by a Certificate of Occupancy, or a phone call to the appropriate department.

Some argue that lax code enforcement has encouraged buyers to pay full price for illegal improvements. In such cases, a “market value” estimate may be inappropriate for a lender client, as unexpected future enforcement of city codes could jeopardize these illegal uses. All it takes is one major fire or disaster to change the political climate for code enforcement. This recently happened in the city of Chicago as the result of a disastrous fire.

Be alert to clues of illegal improvements. For instance, a studio apartment without a thermostat, in a building with central heating and cooling, could be a walled-off master bedroom from another two-bedroom apartment. Some landlords do this because they can get more rent from a one bedroom apartment and a studio together than from a two bedroom apartment alone."



ABOUT THE AUTHOR:
Vernon Martin, M.S.R.E., CFE
Vernon Martin, CFE, is the principal and founder of American Property Research, a valuation and advisory firm serving commercial mortgage lenders. He is a Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE) and certified general appraiser in several states and has a Master of Science in Real Estate degree from Southern Methodist University and an undergraduate degree in Urban Geography from the University of Chicago. He has previously functioned as the chief commercial appraiser at Home Savings of America, IndyMac Bank and Velocity Commercial Capital. He teaches part-time at California State University and has published in The Appraisal Journal, The Banking Law Journal, Real Estate Review, The RMA Journal, Fraud Magazine and Mortgage Banking.

https://www.hg.org/article.asp?id=7093
 
Last edited:
So True. I just had one on Friday, where the Realtor linked her MLS Listing with an incorrect TMS # to an entirely different Property. Something didn't look right when comparing the Public Records data to my measurements. It wouldn't have taken much to miss that and really end up with egg on an Appraiser's face....no, make that souffle, omelet, and quiche. Would be difficult to explain that one to a Board.
 
The City of Lowell will fine you civilly, make you remove the unpermitted alterations and if you check with the insurance company, I don't think that they are legally required to indemnify unpermitted units/alterations in the event of a catastrophe.
 
Same Article above:


"Too many appraisers, though, treat a contract purchase price as prima facie evidence of market value, and end up using flawed reasoning to adjust the comparable data to fit the purchase price."
 
The assessors in virtually every state in the Union consider the purchase price as rebuttable prima facie evidence of market value.

I find your forum signature tag line offensive.
 
Oh, and once again I see you totally missed the point (or intentionally obscured or omitted information) in trying to defend your narrow point of view. Why didn't you post the rest of Mr. Martins discussion regarding contract analysis?

My point in posting the image of your post (beyond the irony) was to show that you are not thinking critically. A very important point in Mr. Martins article concerns contract analysis, yet you have vehemently opposed contract analysis for years and years.
 
Last edited:
The assessors in virtually every state in the Union consider the purchase price as rebuttable prima facie evidence of market value.


The assessors in virtually every state in the Union consider the recorded, Closed Sale price as rebuttable prima facie evidence of market value.

fixed it for you. :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top