farming out your land (so to speak) does not mean your property is no longer commercial. If the property is commercial, it takes a commercial appraiser to do it and it has to be done as a commercial property. You can't take commercial property and appraise it as SF Res.
It appears to be a gray area of where commercial begins and residential ends. The dictionary of Real Estate defines a commercial property as a property that produces income.
Under that definition the lady with 10 acres, a 12,000 SF indoor riding arena, multiple paddocks and a SFR has a commercial property (I appraised this last year).
However on another assignment the guy with 20 acres of wooded land and a house does not have an income producing property.
Where does residential end and commercial start? And is ag commercial all the time?
For the OP he has 50 acres. In my neck of the woods we start to have a marketing problem for the farm land and the home and if they are on one parcel there will be limited buyers who wants the house and 50 acres and there will be a limited number of farmers who want the house with the land. Therefore a discount is warranted after a certain land size is achieved.
Is 50 acres commercial? Can it be done on a 1004 form? I would say that it can be done and I have done it many times.
The argument of misleading goes out the door because the lender knows what type of property it is and this is most likely not going Fannie.
A couple months ago I had an estate property. There was a nice home built in 2005 on 160 acres. Very good farm land. I explained to the client that the Highest and Best Use of the property would be to split off the home and a couple acres in that would most likely bring the highest value to the property. They agreed so I wrote two reports, one for the home hypothetically and one for the farm land being split hypothetically.
Two weeks ago the lender calls (one of the members of the estate was buying the others out) and needs the reports converted to lending purposes. Lender informs me that they did not split the property as I instructed and it would all need to be on one report.
I wrote the new report narratively and noted in the report that because the $260,000 house was not split from the 160 acres there would be a limited pool of buyers should the property be marketed as is and that a discount would be necessary to the property as one vs. the home being separated from the 160 acres.