Have Laser-Will Travel
Member
- Joined
- May 17, 2009
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- Nevada
Is there a technique for determining how much the market will pay when the subject (SFR) is superior to everything that has sold in recent years?
Searching in another neighborhood for a comparable is a trap because if the sales are higher, it's a arguably a superior neighborhood with greater demand and buyer power.
The subject has a 3,000 sq. ft. Spanish dwelling of magnificent architectural detail. It's one of the most magical properties I've seen. The neighborhood median dwelling size is around 1,100 sq. ft. Public records show that there are 13 other SFR dwellings in existence that are of 2,900 sq. ft. or more, the largest being 4,600 sq. ft. That means it's in the top .1% in terms of size.
Early on in my career, I was taught that there are certain people with good buying power that need to live in the neighborhood they are associated with, even if they could afford a much better area. An example might be a politician. This creates a small and finite market but, the marketing period may be excessive. I just don't know.
Also, and more importantly, I feel in the current low-interest, high-demand Los Angeles market, the subject is likely to fetch a higher price than all the other sales here. The best comparable sold recently for $675,000 and is a craftsman design with good architectural appeal but it's only 2,000 sq. ft. Am I doomed to the limit of the highest sale price?
Searching in another neighborhood for a comparable is a trap because if the sales are higher, it's a arguably a superior neighborhood with greater demand and buyer power.
The subject has a 3,000 sq. ft. Spanish dwelling of magnificent architectural detail. It's one of the most magical properties I've seen. The neighborhood median dwelling size is around 1,100 sq. ft. Public records show that there are 13 other SFR dwellings in existence that are of 2,900 sq. ft. or more, the largest being 4,600 sq. ft. That means it's in the top .1% in terms of size.
Early on in my career, I was taught that there are certain people with good buying power that need to live in the neighborhood they are associated with, even if they could afford a much better area. An example might be a politician. This creates a small and finite market but, the marketing period may be excessive. I just don't know.
Also, and more importantly, I feel in the current low-interest, high-demand Los Angeles market, the subject is likely to fetch a higher price than all the other sales here. The best comparable sold recently for $675,000 and is a craftsman design with good architectural appeal but it's only 2,000 sq. ft. Am I doomed to the limit of the highest sale price?