We have appraisers participating *in this thread* who didn't have a college education when they started appraising but whose competency and professionalism past or present has never been questioned. That everyone here can acknowledge that fact in one breath and then turn around and say that it was a mistake to let them in is actually very annoying to me. As in, unacceptable.
Yes, you have a point, yet you fail to admit the reverse- the ,many who didn't have a college education when they started appraising but whose incompetency and lack of professionalism past or present has dragged the field down.
. Why did appraisal alone of all professions need regulatory intervention separating appraisers from direct order on res lender side? Why was it so vulnerable to the low fee exploitation of AMC's after the HVCC? While no studies are done, or at least non made public, to which education level appraisers did what, the fact that fields where a degree is an entry barrier, while they have a share of rogues and crooks they are an isolated few and the professions self maintain without outside intervention.
I don't think its' a matter of that segment of lousy appraisers non degree who went down the wrong path lack ethics, however many of them lacked the confidence and background a degree imparts to keep them from crossing the line. The problems n appraising are partially about dealing with client pressure or conflicting demands of appraisal and business interests.
There may be college level appraisers also who went down the wrong path but if I had to bet money, I'd bet a lower percentage of them did. And a good number of the more competent, quality minded non college on res side have been obtaining degrees or moving to commercial license, negating the reason for your appeal.