- Joined
- Jan 15, 2002
- Professional Status
- Certified General Appraiser
- State
- California
Why to to such lengths when a college degree already did that? And who is the "we" that are going to test for it?
The tests for credits under the College Level Exam Program - inclusive of the interntal structure that grades them - already exist. The applicants can pay for them, so there's no public burden to object to.
We can also incorporate more graded writing assignments in the QE courses - uniform to everyone and specific to what we actually do, and also payable by the applicants.
When it comes to obtaining a higher minimum level of skills outside of a college degree requirement "Can't be done" literally isn't an argument because it clearly can be done in an expedient and cost-efficient manner that won't limit would-be appraisers to those people who are in an economic position to undertain a $70k student loan debt.
Which now that I mention it, brings up the diversity issue in our business. In contrast to the idea that it takes a college degree to be competent at appraising houses, the lack of diversity in our business is pretty obvious.
Adding unnecessary academic credentials to the minimum requirements of aspiring appraisers will have a disparate effect on all economically disadvantaged applicants, regardless of their other personal attributes.
Last edited: