Econobot
Junior Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2019
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- Colorado
All I do, it seems, are oddball rural assignments, it's where I live... Land value is always critical but it becomes less important when you find comparables that are close by, location seems to have a major impact on values (at least where I'm at). The saving grace behind this type of work is bracketing, it helps solves the puzzle by reigning in a tighter range. Granted when you engage in these efforts you usually end up with a large spread between unadjusted sale prices but if your adjustments are solid and data-driven, the adjusted range will tighten and the method needs to be explained. IMO opinion you can't go wrong with bracketing, going back in time, and going to another area... IMO you need to have time adjustment support and location support (from land sales) once you go further away from your subject. All of this should be the standard operating procedure for competent appraisers... Comparing a property 20 miles closer to an economic center with no location adjustment is misleading. I've seen too many reports where the appraiser went far away from the subject and made no adjustment for location, this is borderline fraud loosely based on the principle of progression. Before I was an appraiser, reading the first appraisal report (ever) on the property we were buying I became livid when I noticed the use of a comparable 25 miles away in an area where they can't give the land away... I think my economics background kicked in and I felt that this distant property was in an area we would never consider living was not a comparable (we looked at a property near it). I later discovered that the appraiser searches for comparables based on sale prices and could care less where the property is located, classic form filling. I was astounded as you can drive 100 miles and find land you can't give away, and in town lots selling for 1 million cash. Location is everything...