• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

Extraction Method

Status
Not open for further replies.
These exchanges got a little personal, which is generally counterproductive to the substance of the discussion. When we're talking about each other we usually aren't taking about the subject. Disagreements with an opinion shouldn't be taken personally because we generally don't mean it personally - until it get's personal, that is. There are no two of us who see eye-to-eye on everything. That doesn't make it personal.

OTOH, this is Thunderdome, and part of the job description for appraisers is being extremely opinionated and willing to mount that vigorous defense.

I was just clarifying your universal opinion that others don't begrudge my opinion. This is child's play compared to some of the other forums... :)
 
Page 2:

The income approach was considered but not completed. The cost approach was completed. See Page 3 for comments on each approach. The sales comparison approach is the best method of valuing residential property as it is a direct reflection of market activity. Range of pricing for similar properties is $550,000 (±) to $575,000. Adjusted indication range is $572k (±) to $580k. Bracket ($572k) given most consideration and rounded to $575k based on subjects favorable features.

Page 3:

Notes on the Cost Approach:
Land value developed using the sales comparison method. See exhibit addendum for land sales analyzed and comments below. Building costs estimated using the Marshall & Swift Cost Handbook (online - SwiftEstimator) for a good quality, two story residential structure. Effective age of 10 to 12 years; extended life method used to estimate depreciation. Additional items included a 4-stall, prefabricated horse barn with 6-rail portable corral and roof. In addition there is a 12' x 36' prefabricated storage building (used as an artist studio) with a small wood deck and shed roof. I have used the cost tables and methods published by the California Board of Equalizations Handbook AH 534 (2019 v.) at pages 13 and 22. See exhibit addendum. The cost approach is most reliable when the improvements are proposed or new, and this reliability can suffer as the age of the improvements increases due to difficulty in estimating depreciation from all sources. The cost approach resulted in a market value indication that is reasonbly similar to the market value indications in the Sales Comparison Approach.

Notes on the Income Approach:
The income approach was considered but was not necessary in developing credible assignment results for the intended use of this appraisal. Single family residential property on acreage is not typically purchased for it's ability to generate rental income.

Reconciliation of the sales comparison approach in the narrative comment section:

Reconciliation:
The range of market value indicators (sale prices after adjustments) is narrow given the quality and quantity of the available data. That range is $571,500 to about $580,000. The bracket is $572,000 which is similar to the MV indication from the cost approach. The subject has several favorable features including privacy, equestrian amenities, outdoor features, a larger size residence in good condition, and close proximity to the Russian River. I have given most consideration to the bracket of MV indications, rounded upward to $575,000 given the above listed features.

? Are you asking my opinion if I think this is good narrative? Or was this meant for someone else?
 
The market value definition is clearly stated in the forms. And it has nothing to do with the CA.
 
Since we're sharing verbiage from reports (which I think is edifying to others - sorry for the big word, CANative), here's a piece I dug up from an appraisal I did at some point.

The cost approach was considered, but not developed and reported as the appraiser considers the cost approach to be meaningless and possibly misleading. *Noted: GLA calculations are an estimate and are developed for the purpose of comparing the subject to other properties. This appraiser's GLA estimate is not intended to be exact. Should the seller or buyer desire an exact estimate of GLA, an engineer is recommended.*
 
"An estimate of teh depreciated cost of the improvements is deducted from the total sale price of the PROPERTY to arrive at the land value."

I understand what you are saying although it is a bad interpretation. Go to Appraising Residential Properties, 4th Edition, page 250.

".............To estimate land or site value by extraction ......... the appraiser deducts the contributory value of teh improvements from the total sale price of EACH COMPARABLE........"........... " ......... The resulting indications are then reconciled into an opinion of land or site value for the subject....."

I also think you are inferring you that you can use the subject property for exxtraction which you cannot. The reason is the same for an income property; you don't derive the GRM from the subject by dividing the sale price by the rent. It is an incestuous conclusion.
 
which is one reason I think the cost approach is meaningless for residential assignments.

Maybe time for another thread but I can assure you that the cost approach is meaningful for residential assignments in multiple ways but I don't want to muddy the waters here with that discussion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top