Thanks for the replies, I guess I'll be both terrified and chill about this, since the responses vary greatly... haha. I stand firmly behind my work, this particular lender sent me 3 different sets of revisions (never happens to me); stupid ones that had nothing to do with value. I was diligent in providing thorough explanations of every decision I made there. \/°\/ cest la vie
LOL, yes...there is no answer that is full-proof or fool-proof. Our state mandates (if AMC) the client's ability to complete reviews-random audits, could be the unhappy borrower, could be the answers you provided in revision didn't provide "answers" they wanted for the "loan", lender could be looking for the hook to pass on lending,
could be anything.
Just be ready and review your workfile while it's fresh on your mind.
2019 I had two -value challenges, a first & second, ever. I simply addressed the comps' provided & why I didn't. Always review the 'specific" lender instructions, as well as, the market reasons for the "whys".
One of those circumstances, I was so over-thorough, it prompted a call from the head-chief supervisor for the national lender. She wanted to let me know in person (so-to-speak), the responses I provided were so very thorough & to the point she wished other appraisers would be so "professional", not emotional.
My point in that is in the end you gain a great client. As it turned out, the lender rep' was a personal friend of the borrower. The Rep' was trying to get squeeze all of the juice out of the lemon.
I had not actually done anything wrong & was informed there would be no further concern on my end. Kind of her to call.
Be a scout, be prepared, you should be OK.