• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

Oakland appraisal dispute settlement

Bay Area home appraiser must pay $75K, watch ABC7 documentary in discrimination settlement agreement​



that dude can't stop smiling...like he just hit the lotto...and E&O just rolled over :rof:
 

Bay Area home appraiser must pay $75K, watch ABC7 documentary in discrimination settlement agreement​



that dude can't stop smiling...like he just hit the lotto...and E&O just rolled over :rof:
I didn't follow it to close but selling the subject soon after for $300k more than the appraisal in question may have had something to do with the settlement. And his wife/co-plaintiff is now an appraiser. What a twist. Think Clear Capital sends her work?
 
Last edited:
Hit a number, as fast as you can, sign a document, everything is OK RIGHT! Go on to the Next assignment. You Would NEVER be prosecuted or questioned, SAD. We are just justifying loan amounts, and I guess too slow or low we are no longer needed.,
 
i'm surprised that the E&O covered for this criminal mischief... :unsure::rof:
 
"Discrimination" was only the horrific title to file a complaint with. There is nothing criminal when stupid is involved in this case, after reading it.
 

Appraiser who undervalued a Black and Latino couple’s Oakland home must pay them $75K​

By Bob Egelko,Courts ReporterApril 14, 2025



A Black and Latino couple in Oakland will receive $75,000 to compensate them for a property appraisal that undervalued their home by more than $250,000, state civil rights officials said Monday.
Jessica Christian/The Chronicle

A Black and Latino couple in Oakland will receive $75,000 to compensate them for a property appraisal that undervalued their home by more than $250,000, which prevented them from getting a new loan and eventually led them to move out, state civil rights officials said Monday.
The settlement of a complaint by the California Civil Rights Department also requires the appraisal company, Clear Capital, to train employees on identifying and preventing possible racial and ethnic bias in assessing property value.


ACT NOW
“Whether it’s lowball appraisals or a history of redlining, communities of color across the country continue to confront the multigenerational harms of housing discrimination,” the department’s director, Kevin Kish, said in a statement announcing the settlement. “Appraisers, lenders and brokers all have a responsibility to prevent discrimination in real estate transactions.”
Advertisement


Clear Capital did not respond to a request for comment. The company, based in Reno, describes itself as one of the nation’s top five appraisal managers.
In a related settlement, the Civil Rights Department said the individual assessor, who was not identified by name, had agreed to pay $75,000 to the couple and $15,000 to the department, undergo anti-discrimination training and watch an ABC documentary, “Our America: Lowballed,” on the effects of appraisal bias on communities of color.

This is not the only case of its kind. In 2023, a Black couple in Marin City settled their case against another company Miller and Perotti Real Estate Appraisers, who assessed their home at $995,000 in 2020.

A few weeks later, when a white friend of the couple posed as the owner, an appraiser from another company assessed the same property at $1,482,500. The couple, Paul Austin and Tenisha Tate-Austin, said the under-appraisal made it harder for them to obtain refinancing for home improvements at a time of low interest rates, the same problem cited by the couple in the Oakland case.

In the Oakland case, the Civil Rights Department said it received a complaint in 2022 from the nonprofit Fair Housing Advocates of Northern California that the Black and Latino couple had received an appraisal from Clear Capital that was $254,000 less than another assessor had valued the same home eight months earlier.


When the couple then tried to refinance their home under the declining interest rates, the lender turned them down, and they decided they had to leave — selling the home, nine months later, for $300,000 more than the previous assessment, the Civil Rights Department said.
The department declined to identify the couple. “We generally withhold the names of individual complainants to protect their privacy,” said Rishi Khalsa, a spokesperson for the department.
Reach Bob Egelko: begelko@sfchronicle.com.


https://www.sfchronicle.com/politics/article/oakland-appraisal-settlement-20275834.php

... :rof:
Not good hound dog. If appraiser had racial bias? good.,

If appraiser would have tried to rectify? good.
 
To look at how I would calculate a "Bias Market" or "Bias Appraisers in a Market", I would look at my local SMA statistics (Hopefully updated from the last Census).
If, say, the SMA is 78 % White/Asian and 20 % People of Color, 2 % Other, then 8 out of 10 appraisers would be White. That's not discrimination, that's the market.
 
Controversial thread a few months back to this very issue...... to go or not to go to certain areas and risk financial ruin.
Any appraiser who does not take that into account the risk of appraising in certain areas, especially in states run by leftists is a fool. If I was a CA appraiser, I would never appraise any refinances in most of Oakland and would turn down any purchase-related appriasal if it was not obvious from the start that the appraised value was going to come in at or over the contract price.
 
"I would never appraise any refinances in most of Oakland and would turn down any purchase-related appriasal if it was not obvious from the start that the appraised value was going to come in at or over the contract price."


Some forumites accused brother Fernando of being a racist for saying the same thing....

Plus pre-determining a value is so unethical....
 
Loan Depot has been accused of racial bias and paid the people off IIRC. Have they made statements or helped Shane Lanham? Did they continue to give work to Shane Lanham after he was falsely accused? Tell them you were accused and they will thank you by not giving you work, not that you would want to work with them.
As somebody who works in the risk department of a major secondary market participant, I can tell you that it would be almost impossible for a lender to continue to utilize an appraiser after they found out he was being sued for alleged racial discrmination as the potential liability risk to the lender is just too great for them to keep using him until and unless the litigation against that appraiser is resolved in his favor. It really stinks, but it is in the lender's interest to limit, not expand their potential laibility and doing so would require them to no longer use that appraiser.
 
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top