I have a client that is demanding a cost to cure for mpr repairs on an FHA report.
HUD states to give a cost to cure. However, on page 844 - 845 of the 4000.1 they also state, "When examination of New or Existing Construction reveals noncompliance with MPR and
MPS, the Appraiser must report the repairs necessary to make the Property comply, provide an estimated cost to cure, provide descriptive photographs, and condition the appraisal for the
required repairs. If compliance can only be effected by major repairs or alterations, the Appraiser must report all readily observable property deficiencies, as well as any adverse conditions discovered
performing the research involved in completion of the appraisal, within the reporting form.Regardless of the Appraiser’s suggested repairs, the Mortgagee will determine which repairs are required."
"The Appraiser must notify the Mortgagee and make the appraisal subject to an inspection by a qualified individual or entity when the observation reveals evidence of a potential
safety, soundness, or security issue beyond the Appraiser’s ability to assess. The Appraiser must report and describe the indication of a particular problem when requiring
an inspection of any mechanical system, structural system, or other component requiring a repair."
Basically when an appraiser can reasonably estimate the cost to cure based on their knowledge and available resources, they should provide that estimate as required by HUD Handbook 4000.1.
If the appraiser is unable to confidently estimate the cost of a repair , the inspection by a qualified individual or entity will provide a more accurate assessment and cost estimate.
So if as an appraiser I feel applying cost to cure is beyond my expertise I believe FHA allows me to not provide.
I know FHA is never cut and dry but my interpretation of this rule allows me to refrain from giving a cost to cure and to rely on experts to determine costs to repair.
what do you guys feel?
HUD states to give a cost to cure. However, on page 844 - 845 of the 4000.1 they also state, "When examination of New or Existing Construction reveals noncompliance with MPR and
MPS, the Appraiser must report the repairs necessary to make the Property comply, provide an estimated cost to cure, provide descriptive photographs, and condition the appraisal for the
required repairs. If compliance can only be effected by major repairs or alterations, the Appraiser must report all readily observable property deficiencies, as well as any adverse conditions discovered
performing the research involved in completion of the appraisal, within the reporting form.Regardless of the Appraiser’s suggested repairs, the Mortgagee will determine which repairs are required."
"The Appraiser must notify the Mortgagee and make the appraisal subject to an inspection by a qualified individual or entity when the observation reveals evidence of a potential
safety, soundness, or security issue beyond the Appraiser’s ability to assess. The Appraiser must report and describe the indication of a particular problem when requiring
an inspection of any mechanical system, structural system, or other component requiring a repair."
Basically when an appraiser can reasonably estimate the cost to cure based on their knowledge and available resources, they should provide that estimate as required by HUD Handbook 4000.1.
If the appraiser is unable to confidently estimate the cost of a repair , the inspection by a qualified individual or entity will provide a more accurate assessment and cost estimate.
So if as an appraiser I feel applying cost to cure is beyond my expertise I believe FHA allows me to not provide.
I know FHA is never cut and dry but my interpretation of this rule allows me to refrain from giving a cost to cure and to rely on experts to determine costs to repair.
what do you guys feel?