Tim Hicks (Texas)
Elite Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2002
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- Texas
When appraising 1-4 family properties I choose to stick with like kind properties. In other words, I will only use duplex sales comps on duplex appraisals, triplex for triplex, fourplex for fourplex. I will occasionally use rental comps of different multi-family properties if I have more similar individual units to demonstrate the rental market.
My question is: Have you ever been asked to use a triplex or fouplex sales comp on a duplex property, or actually used triplex or fourplex sale in the market grid? I have never done it because I consider it GIGO. Now, if you actually deducted the amount equivalent to the number of units of difference, then it might make since, but nobody would want you to make that large adjustment. Now, the GRM for the different style property might be useful, but it just seems inappropriate to me to use a different style 1-4 family in the sales comparison approach.
I ask this because, after 13+ years of appraising by my own terms, I have been challenged on a re-consideration of value to utilize a triplex property on a duplex appraisal. It seems that the loan officer contacted another appraisal company and they told the loan officer that this triplex was a better comp and they would have utilized it.
It seems that Skippy & Skippy Appraisal Company is going out of their way to discredit my appraisal. Never mind that their triplex comp is owner financed and water front and my duplex is on a interior lot. If you multiply their triplex by 2/3 you get the same value I have. The GRM is the same, but Skippy and Skippy can get $25,000 more than I did. Never mind, that I have a duplex sale from the same street, same size, same age that sold for the same as my appraised value. It seems Skippy & Skippy appraised the one on my street for way more than the sales price and told the loan officer that the sale was a distress sale. However, I spoke to the RE agent, who happened to be the listing and selling agent, who told me point blank that the duplex comp was not a distress sale, they based their list price on a Skippy & Skippy appraisal and the sales price was simply the best offer they got.
Why is it that Skippy & Skippy must be always right, just because they are higher? It seems I get to spend more time defending my value, just because I refuse to do what Skippy & Skippy do.
My question is: Have you ever been asked to use a triplex or fouplex sales comp on a duplex property, or actually used triplex or fourplex sale in the market grid? I have never done it because I consider it GIGO. Now, if you actually deducted the amount equivalent to the number of units of difference, then it might make since, but nobody would want you to make that large adjustment. Now, the GRM for the different style property might be useful, but it just seems inappropriate to me to use a different style 1-4 family in the sales comparison approach.
I ask this because, after 13+ years of appraising by my own terms, I have been challenged on a re-consideration of value to utilize a triplex property on a duplex appraisal. It seems that the loan officer contacted another appraisal company and they told the loan officer that this triplex was a better comp and they would have utilized it.
It seems that Skippy & Skippy Appraisal Company is going out of their way to discredit my appraisal. Never mind that their triplex comp is owner financed and water front and my duplex is on a interior lot. If you multiply their triplex by 2/3 you get the same value I have. The GRM is the same, but Skippy and Skippy can get $25,000 more than I did. Never mind, that I have a duplex sale from the same street, same size, same age that sold for the same as my appraised value. It seems Skippy & Skippy appraised the one on my street for way more than the sales price and told the loan officer that the sale was a distress sale. However, I spoke to the RE agent, who happened to be the listing and selling agent, who told me point blank that the duplex comp was not a distress sale, they based their list price on a Skippy & Skippy appraisal and the sales price was simply the best offer they got.
Why is it that Skippy & Skippy must be always right, just because they are higher? It seems I get to spend more time defending my value, just because I refuse to do what Skippy & Skippy do.