DMZwerg
Senior Member
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2009
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- Wisconsin
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Small...content/main/162632968//date/desc/11/s1981731
Saw this in the paper this morning and figured it deserved some coverage and discussion. The full article title on Yahoo was "Small banks failing as larger firms regain health", which is similar to the title given in the local paper and about as good of a synopsis as I can think of.
As I read the article I could not help but think of it in context of Dodd-Frank, HVCC, etc, and what first occurred to me was what affect AMCs had in contributing to this decline. Small banks don't have interest in AMCs yet many larger banks own at least a portion of some and said AMCs aggressively marketed themselves to the smaller banks after HVCC came into play. So, as the market crashed the larger banks, especially given the bailout money and influx of funds from AMCs, could better afford to retract in certain areas and choose to not fund the riskier loans (or shuffle them off their books to FNMA and such more efficiently). Furthermore, in the more recent mention of buying back bad loans the larger banks seemed to draw a line and refuse to buy back were as I could see smaller banks falling pray to said more easily. Net result would be an increasing trend towards the failure of local banks allowing the big to be in place to get bigger in the future when a recovery happens, and said could well have been a secondary affect of HVCC.
Bottom line in my opinion: *ALL* AMCs need to be regulated (if not eliminated) not only to aid appraisers, but also to aid small banks and promote both more equal competition between banks but also more equal avenues for employment.
Discuss
Saw this in the paper this morning and figured it deserved some coverage and discussion. The full article title on Yahoo was "Small banks failing as larger firms regain health", which is similar to the title given in the local paper and about as good of a synopsis as I can think of.
As I read the article I could not help but think of it in context of Dodd-Frank, HVCC, etc, and what first occurred to me was what affect AMCs had in contributing to this decline. Small banks don't have interest in AMCs yet many larger banks own at least a portion of some and said AMCs aggressively marketed themselves to the smaller banks after HVCC came into play. So, as the market crashed the larger banks, especially given the bailout money and influx of funds from AMCs, could better afford to retract in certain areas and choose to not fund the riskier loans (or shuffle them off their books to FNMA and such more efficiently). Furthermore, in the more recent mention of buying back bad loans the larger banks seemed to draw a line and refuse to buy back were as I could see smaller banks falling pray to said more easily. Net result would be an increasing trend towards the failure of local banks allowing the big to be in place to get bigger in the future when a recovery happens, and said could well have been a secondary affect of HVCC.
Bottom line in my opinion: *ALL* AMCs need to be regulated (if not eliminated) not only to aid appraisers, but also to aid small banks and promote both more equal competition between banks but also more equal avenues for employment.
Discuss