Dorrie:
Congraulations! You got an answer! You were proactive and did what has to be done!

:usa

lympic: :usa
Please do not fail to note that you got this answer
at this time speaking to
that person in
YOUR HOC. Other answers may vary 8O
Do not fail to note that asking the very same question at some time in the (fairly) recent past I got the
OPPOSITE 8O answer by calling MY local HOC (Denver) ~ I consider this to be a problem: NO-where is/was this issue addressed directly in writing or by reference: unless a fairly recent determination was made (as a result of the original thread). I still find no specific written mention of this issue in HUD Documentation!!!!
If this sounds like a scream approaching jet engine decible level you got it!
I can happily live with this answer that you got
in your area at this time.
Ummm however not to throw ice water on your efforts... but:
May I point out that you are not finished? What sort of drywall? door, etc...
I am going to post Paul's resolution for anyone too time pressed to look it up as it further makes my point: WE are given NO direction in application of these unwritten rules that we are supposed to GUESS exist in the first place :evil: !
For those following my drywall saga...
I got an email reply from Gerry Glavey, the director of HUD in Phili who said..."on an existing property, HUD/FHA requires that there be a wall separating the garage area from other areas of the property. However, we do not have minimum standards with respect to the fire-rated drywall".
So, to paraphrase an infamous president, it all depends on what the definition of the word 'wall' is. 8)
We have finally received a copy of the VC sheet and found out it also calls for the wall to be drywalled between the living area and garage, makes sense. I have placed a call to the appraiser to find out his personal specs on the drywall, since HUD has none and neither does our municipality, so we can get appropriate repair quotes. {snip irrelevancies} I believe the appraiser should let us know what he is going to require when he reinspects. I sure don't want to spend the money and not have it suit the appraiser. {snip}
some of the 'irelevancies' involved the appraiser NOT calling Mr. Ness back: what a surprise (I am not throwing blame here-other than at the system).
So we have two HOCs that say: "Yes, required" One that says: "No, not required" and no indication in writing ANYWHERE that tells us that this
is a requirement! You the appraiser are supposed to pick it up by osmosis

! It all depends on what the meaning of 'is' is?!?!?
Oh BTW you can be reviewed and possibly sanctioned for your lack of knowlege of this unwritten SAFETY rule.... :x
SO is updating of antiquated but functional electrical, plumbing, and OTHER structural systems REQUIRED? Stair height to tread ratios? WHY NOT? $$ Time intrusiveness? What are the citeria for application?
If this other "bring it up to code" IS a requirement - sometimes - sort of - it depends :evil: :evil: :evil: Which other safety items SHOULD we be applying :? .
I probably have more code and safety items memorized that the typical appraiser: worked in San Mateo County CA when their building codes (and their rogue inspectors) made many builders' jobs a nightmare of conflicting and unwritten compliance issues.
To what extent should I apply my hard earned knowlege to FHA when they on one hand insist that we be the eyes in the field, and are NOT to apply unreasonable barriers to loan acquistion ("do it by the book
only"), except by the way we have these unwritten
rooles?

nfire:
rant mode off 