Borrowers Sue Over Recycled Appraisal

[BRCJR]

Umm did you read my comment? " there is the statement the appraiser had viewed the property in the previous month." If in fact it was an exterior assignment, the appraiser had adequate knowledge to make the determination of the physical characteristics of the home. They had been there, inside and outside the home for a full appraiser less than a month previously. Your own eyes are a pretty good way to obtain information. And for all we know they did call and ask about any improvements and they were accounted for.

My point in going down this path is that there is too little information to have a supported opinion.

You got way too many "if's" in your scenario.
You seem to want to argue a point I am not even making.
My point is ONLY if you place a statement in the report such as "the interior is in similar condition as the exterior" is worthless.

Why is that so hard to understand?

 

[Sadie]

You got way too many "if's" in your scenario.
You seem to want to argue a point I am not even making.
My point is ONLY if you place a statement in the report such as "the interior is in similar condition as the exterior" is worthless.

Why is that so hard to understand?

HaHa, I never said that, that was you not reading and/or understanding my post. "the interior is in similar condition as the exterior" is all you, I never said that or even inferred that. That was you making stuff up. Why is that so hard to understand?

 

[Sadie]

You got way too many "if's" in your scenario.
You seem to want to argue a point I am not even making.
My point is ONLY if you place a statement in the report such as "the interior is in similar condition as the exterior" is worthless.

Why is that so hard to understand?

What is hard for you to understand is that there is insufficient information in the filing to know what exactly the appraiser (s) did wrong. That is why there are are 'ifs' in my post. Did you read and understand the filing? It sure doesn't seem like it.

 

[Dublin ohio]

there is insufficient information in the filing to know what exactly the appraiser (s) did wrong.

What information is missing

Did you read and understand the filing? It sure doesn't seem like it.

Seriously

 

[Tom D]

oh my gosh. it goes from some comments, to slap fighting. 15 comment pages, when probable 2 were sufficient to know it should end. not that there's anything wrong with a good dope slap to the head.