Anonymoose
Freshman Member
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2011
- Professional Status
- Real Estate Agent or Broker
- State
- Utah
In my area, market inventory is extreme-shortage. There is less than 1 month supply of listings in all price ranges and categories. Values have been increasing at more than 1% per month within all value ranges. The greatest rate of increase has occurred within the lower price ranges.
This week I published a new property listing in the role of Listing Agent. Subject property is a 2 bedroom townhouse-style condo unit with built-in 2 car garage and no basement. The subject is a typical entry-level home within this market. The list price is based on the highest recent comparable sales of similar sized units from within the subject neighborhood. Putting on my appraiser hat here, I honestly don’t think a higher list price can be supported by recent sales.
The listing was active for 2 days. We had 34 showings and received 12 offers. One of the offers was full price. The other 11 offers are above asking price with a median offer $20,000 higher than asking price. One of the buyer agents explained that his buyer is trying to buy the property based on the future price. His reasoning is that since properties are increasing 1% per month. He can afford to offer 6% or more above asking price and it’s no big deal because it just means he will have to wait a few months after the purchase before he starts increasing equity. This strategy has been adopted by most of the buyers who sent offers.
Question: If buyers are now buying based on the future value of the property then doesn’t that mean the future value is actually today’s market value? The more I think about this recursive reasoning, the more confused I get.
The buyers and buyer agents involved with entry level properties have become super-aggressive, padding the offers with free 60 day lease-backs or offering to pay a portion of the seller’s closing costs. 9 out of the 12 offers said they would pay above the appraised value in amounts ranging from $2,000 to $30,000 above appraised value (up to negotiated contract price). One of the offers removed the appraisal contingency completely.
Question: What is the point of the appraisal and what is the value of the appraisal product when industry participants are disregarding the appraisal results?
One of the buyers is a young family who said they have now submitted 25 offers without getting a contract accepted. They didn’t get acceptance on this deal because they only offered to pay $6,000 above appraised value and didn’t use an escalation clause.
Question: How can entry-level buyers compete in this marketplace if they don’t have enough cash to pay $30,000 above appraised value?
This has been an excellent deal for my sellers but it feels to me like the market is broken in some way and I’m a bit worried for the future of the real estate market and the economy in general. I look forward to your comments.
This week I published a new property listing in the role of Listing Agent. Subject property is a 2 bedroom townhouse-style condo unit with built-in 2 car garage and no basement. The subject is a typical entry-level home within this market. The list price is based on the highest recent comparable sales of similar sized units from within the subject neighborhood. Putting on my appraiser hat here, I honestly don’t think a higher list price can be supported by recent sales.
The listing was active for 2 days. We had 34 showings and received 12 offers. One of the offers was full price. The other 11 offers are above asking price with a median offer $20,000 higher than asking price. One of the buyer agents explained that his buyer is trying to buy the property based on the future price. His reasoning is that since properties are increasing 1% per month. He can afford to offer 6% or more above asking price and it’s no big deal because it just means he will have to wait a few months after the purchase before he starts increasing equity. This strategy has been adopted by most of the buyers who sent offers.
Question: If buyers are now buying based on the future value of the property then doesn’t that mean the future value is actually today’s market value? The more I think about this recursive reasoning, the more confused I get.
The buyers and buyer agents involved with entry level properties have become super-aggressive, padding the offers with free 60 day lease-backs or offering to pay a portion of the seller’s closing costs. 9 out of the 12 offers said they would pay above the appraised value in amounts ranging from $2,000 to $30,000 above appraised value (up to negotiated contract price). One of the offers removed the appraisal contingency completely.
Question: What is the point of the appraisal and what is the value of the appraisal product when industry participants are disregarding the appraisal results?
One of the buyers is a young family who said they have now submitted 25 offers without getting a contract accepted. They didn’t get acceptance on this deal because they only offered to pay $6,000 above appraised value and didn’t use an escalation clause.
Question: How can entry-level buyers compete in this marketplace if they don’t have enough cash to pay $30,000 above appraised value?
This has been an excellent deal for my sellers but it feels to me like the market is broken in some way and I’m a bit worried for the future of the real estate market and the economy in general. I look forward to your comments.