Don't know about Louisiana, but California is starting to not love solar.
"California reduces payments for rooftop solar power — for second time in a year
The commission said it altered the rates because paying solar panel owners near-retail prices allows these mostly wealthy property owners to avoid paying a fair share of maintaining the grid.
"Under the new rules, apartment buildings, schools, farms, commercial strips and other facilities where multiple electric meters occupy the same site will receive significantly less money from utility companies in exchange for the excess solar energy they produce and sell back. These customers would be paid about 80% less per unit of energy they sell, solar advocates say. The rates they are paid vary depending on the season and time of day.
“This (new rule) forces them to sell low and buy high,” said Bernadette Del Chiaro, executive director of the California Solar & Storage Association, which led the campaign against the rule change. “No one is going to go solar under that setup.” The reduced incentives will apply immediately to new solar customers or arrays. Older units will be gradually phased in over the next 20 years. The commission also emphasized that existing rates would remain for those enrolled in affordable housing programs."
The utilities commission reduced financial incentives for solar power at apartments, schools and businesses despite a barrage of criticism.
calmatters.org
Like EVs, I think the reality of solar is starting to hit a wall. The PUCs are faced with huge infrastructure costs associated with the demand that would result if a significant percentage of vehicles depend on increasing transmission lines and base capacity. Roof top solar with batteries are a major expense with a very long pay back period. And then there is that solar panels and batteries are associated with China belching out CO2, IMO.