I was wondering if anyone here could help me out. I've been in real estate for the past few years and I am considering entering the appraisal industry. A good friend of mine who's an AL for 20+ years already said he would train me if I wanted to do it. My question is in regards to the 2000 hrs experience required to be an AL in California. So I spoke to two different staff appraisers from the OREA on two separate occasions and both gave me different answers:
The first staff appraiser said I would need to take courses, pass a test, and then get my AT license which would allow me to assist on reports. The way that I would credit or hours toward my experience log is by doing at least 75% of the work (with your mentor's supervision), then signing the report (on the left side), and my supervisor signing the right side.
The second staff appraiser said that getting your AT license first is a misconception. He said you don't need an AT license to start assisting with reports and getting hours. He said you can start getting your hours by doing at least 75% of the work (with your mentor's supervision of course) then detailing your duties in a small paragraph on the text addenda of your report. Then when you're close to your 2000 hrs, you can take the required courses for your AT, pass the test, and then apply for the AL state exam.
Obviously these are two very different ways to attain your hrs. Which one do you think is right? And regarding both methods, how would I go about getting hrs if AMC's from my understanding will not allow anyone to sign or be mentioned on the report under then the head appraiser? Is non-AMC work (personals, estate work, tax reconsiderations, etc) the only way? My friend the AL has trained people in the past and they became licensed through him, but he's not sure now with all these new AMC's and regulations. Is there anyone here that is a AL or AR currently training people or perhaps a newly licensed AL that can shed some light? Preferably in Cali. I know the industry's not advisable to enter anymore but I figure if I have someone who's willing to train me and it probably will only take a year to get my 2000 hrs, then it might be worth doing. Thanks for your time.
The first staff appraiser said I would need to take courses, pass a test, and then get my AT license which would allow me to assist on reports. The way that I would credit or hours toward my experience log is by doing at least 75% of the work (with your mentor's supervision), then signing the report (on the left side), and my supervisor signing the right side.
The second staff appraiser said that getting your AT license first is a misconception. He said you don't need an AT license to start assisting with reports and getting hours. He said you can start getting your hours by doing at least 75% of the work (with your mentor's supervision of course) then detailing your duties in a small paragraph on the text addenda of your report. Then when you're close to your 2000 hrs, you can take the required courses for your AT, pass the test, and then apply for the AL state exam.
Obviously these are two very different ways to attain your hrs. Which one do you think is right? And regarding both methods, how would I go about getting hrs if AMC's from my understanding will not allow anyone to sign or be mentioned on the report under then the head appraiser? Is non-AMC work (personals, estate work, tax reconsiderations, etc) the only way? My friend the AL has trained people in the past and they became licensed through him, but he's not sure now with all these new AMC's and regulations. Is there anyone here that is a AL or AR currently training people or perhaps a newly licensed AL that can shed some light? Preferably in Cali. I know the industry's not advisable to enter anymore but I figure if I have someone who's willing to train me and it probably will only take a year to get my 2000 hrs, then it might be worth doing. Thanks for your time.