Major bank wants a drive-by 2055 for default purposes – the AMC (and presumably lender) don’t know it is a manufactured home until I find out and call the AMC.
They changed the form type to a 1004C 'exterior' – hence my question...
The certificate, assumptions, scope of work, etc that I will be signing state several ‘musts’ that involve interior inspection. And, the form states no deletions, modifications or additions to any of this are permitted.
I am uncomfortable signing and then stating elsewhere in the report that none of this is really true. And I would have to state that I have actually changed the scope of work, limiting conditions and assumptions on this form that I have signed saying I had not.
Isn't this just too many contradictions, or am I just being to literal – if I had no one to run this by I would probably decline the assignment. Something ‘feels’ misleading about stating one thing in one part of the report and stating the contrary in another part of the report.
This major lender has hundreds of these coming through this major AMC
They changed the form type to a 1004C 'exterior' – hence my question...
The certificate, assumptions, scope of work, etc that I will be signing state several ‘musts’ that involve interior inspection. And, the form states no deletions, modifications or additions to any of this are permitted.
I am uncomfortable signing and then stating elsewhere in the report that none of this is really true. And I would have to state that I have actually changed the scope of work, limiting conditions and assumptions on this form that I have signed saying I had not.
Isn't this just too many contradictions, or am I just being to literal – if I had no one to run this by I would probably decline the assignment. Something ‘feels’ misleading about stating one thing in one part of the report and stating the contrary in another part of the report.
This major lender has hundreds of these coming through this major AMC