D
Deleted member 150397
Guest
...I was recently told that using too many comparables, more than 6 generally (4 closed, 2 active) is an indication that the appraiser doesn't know what they are doing and are "all over the place". I generally disagree with these "rule of thumb" thresholds that try to claim everything under the sun can be quantified by general guidelines, which in this case means using only 4 closed sales. Imagine the most complex property in the most rural community for instance, a manufactured house with a stick built addition and massive shop for instance, the odds of finding comparables which bracket the subject in only 4 sales is highly unlikely (based on my experience). Additionally, I have been made aware of a review assignment with 9 comparables (6 closed, 3 active) in the original appraisal and the client is seeking 2 additional comparables, this definitely doesn't promote using only 6 comparables... I would like to gauge your thoughts on this. My current opinion is that you should use as many comparables as you need to bracket the subject property's improvements and ultimately illustrate the principle of substitution with a thorough summary of why each comparable was included, weighted, or given minimal consideration in the overall analysis. Please share your thoughts, thanks!