Vermonter
Elite Member
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2007
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- Vermont
So went into my local stihl dealer for saw chain and get to talking with the owner. Mention I'm an appraiser and of course he starts with the questions.
He's got a large timber parcel and his neighbor is selling off an adjoining large parcel that is landlocked (abuts his parcel). He and the neighbor agree to each get independent appraisals and negotiate a price.
His appraisals OMV is in the $500 per acre range which is typical for landlocked parcels.
The owner of the parcels appraisal OMV was $1200 per acre and he used all road accessible comps around the area. The appraiser stated that because the potential buyers land abuts the property it would not be considered landlocked for him. Something along the lines of- "Market value for the adjoining landowner is considerably higher than market value for the general public." He was sure the term "market value" was used.
I told him that yes, technically the land was more valuable to him as opposed to some joe blow that had to figure out how to access it, but that isn't "market value".
Both appraisers were CGs with abundant experience and stellar reputations. So just wondering am I crazy or is this some appraisal theory I never heard of.

He's got a large timber parcel and his neighbor is selling off an adjoining large parcel that is landlocked (abuts his parcel). He and the neighbor agree to each get independent appraisals and negotiate a price.
His appraisals OMV is in the $500 per acre range which is typical for landlocked parcels.
The owner of the parcels appraisal OMV was $1200 per acre and he used all road accessible comps around the area. The appraiser stated that because the potential buyers land abuts the property it would not be considered landlocked for him. Something along the lines of- "Market value for the adjoining landowner is considerably higher than market value for the general public." He was sure the term "market value" was used.
I told him that yes, technically the land was more valuable to him as opposed to some joe blow that had to figure out how to access it, but that isn't "market value".
Both appraisers were CGs with abundant experience and stellar reputations. So just wondering am I crazy or is this some appraisal theory I never heard of.
