I appreciate your quick reply Webbed Feet. I realize that I am being asked to give two values, based on two different definitions. A definition of Liquidation/Quick Sale value will be included in the report. As far as determining quick sale value, unless I'm wrong, I would attempt to find and review similar REO homes that have sold within 30 days and see what those price ranges are as opposed to those that sold under normal marketing time. What I should come up with is a range in the indicated sales price which will show that quick sales were priced xx% less than those marketed under normal marketing time. Am I wrong? Where are others documenting this on their reports?
Grace,
I'm going to ignore Lobo and bonk you again. Your thinking cap just either is not on today or you need to get somebody local to walk you through this assignment by handing it to them and you being a trainee again..
HOW MANY (opinions of) VALUE??? You need to recount how many you've been asked for and get that right before jumping to concentrating on only one of them. Grace, how many opinions of value is this request asking for? Two, three, four, or more? For a hint, I suspect that you have not cleared up with this client how many yet.
Then you've just altered "comps" to now specifically be "REO comps" over that determination of quick sale value. Again, for a hint, which quick sale value? ... Plus, I note you are already mentally selecting comps when you don't yet seem to have a client agreed upon definition of "Ouick Sale" value... How do we pick comps for an undefined value we don't comprehend? ... Answer: We don't.
More, out of a group of 100% of the available REO sales, how is it that the only the ones that happened to sell in under 30 days are not the ones that meet the definition of "Market Value" for those sales, yet the ones that happened to sell in plus 30 days do? Type me up an addendum explaining to me how all the ones that sold in under 30 days meet a defintion of value, that you don't have or understand yet, and represent "Quick Sale" values for adjustment against "Market Value" sales. I'd love to hear the logic that proves that these faster sales simply were not due to being in better locations, having better floor plans, in superior condition, or not marketed at prices over their individual market value in the first place.
Present your addendum on that...
