• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

Little Guy Takes On Fannie

Status
Not open for further replies.

Elliott

Elite Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2002
Professional Status
Certified General Appraiser
State
Oregon
Nice to hear a story about a little guy who
may have had his arm twisted, but so far
is just doing his job.
elliott


House Alarm
In Fannie Mae Probe, Watchdog
Has Started to Show Its Teeth

Mortgage Giant Could Face
Shake-Up After Report;
Falling Rates Pose Problem
Directors Consider Options
By JAMES R. HAGERTY and JOHN D. MCKINNON
Staff Reporters of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
September 27, 2004; Page A1

WASHINGTON -- Armando Falcon Jr., a soft-spoken financial regulator who relaxes by playing poker with friends, seemed to hold a weak hand when he took on Fannie Mae, the biggest player in U.S. mortgage finance.

Mr. Falcon heads one of the more obscure agencies in Washington -- the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight, or Ofheo, long derided as toothless in its role of monitoring Fannie and its smaller rival, Freddie Mac. Mr. Falcon has about 180 staff members, drives a 15-year-old Volvo and last year earned $158,100.


Fannie Mae -- with 5,000 employees, legendary lobbying skills and assets of $1 trillion -- is the nation's second-largest financial company after Citigroup Inc. Its chief executive, Franklin D. Raines, a former Rhodes scholar, has served as President Clinton's budget chief and is often mentioned as a possible future Treasury Secretary. Last year, his compensation came to about $20 million.

But in his probe of Fannie Mae, Mr. Falcon has taken the offensive. Last week, he released a 200-page report alleging that Fannie's accounting practices have been designed to skirt rules, smooth out earnings and apparently, in at least one case, fatten executive bonuses. By plunking down a long list of unproven but serious allegations, he has forced Fannie's board into a tight position.

A committee of outside directors will have to decide whether to fight Ofheo -- which could be a long and costly process, prolonging the uncertainty that chopped 15% off Fannie's share price last week -- or seek a quick settlement. The latter option might involve dismissing executives or raising minimum capital requirements. Fannie and Ofheo were negotiating through the weekend on a significant increase in the company's capital requirements, according to a person with knowledge of the situation. The regulator previously required Freddie Mac to hold 30% more capital than its usual minimum requirement until the company can clean up its books in the wake of its 2003 accounting scandal.
 
That's just the beginning of the story. They've reached an agreement, but it's not over 'til the fat lady sings:

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/28/business...pagewanted=1&th

...if Fannie Mae's activities were curtailed as a result of the current investigations, mortgage rates may rise modestly, creating a political nightmare for members of Congress who may have to face the wrath of angry homeowners.

and,

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6115962/

"We think the legislation needs to be re-enacted, and the sooner the better," Wayne Abernathy, the assistant Treasury secretary for financial institutions, told reporters, saying action by lawmakers might even be possible in the few remaining weeks before Congress adjourns.
 
Lets track down this little guys address & send him our petition & letters. Show him he has a LITTLE support.
 
I hadn't had time to read my copy of the Journal for a couple of days. I went back and read that whole article. Good reading for anyone who wants to understand what's going on. Unlike most articles, the real "dish" in this story is in the last half, on page A8. My favorite quotes:

Holding such lartge amounts of mortgages is fraught with risk. that's mainly because most Americans take out 30-year fixed-rate loans, with the option to repay the loans early and refinance whenever they wish....
These Americal-style mortgage transfer the risk of interest-rate fluctuations from the borrowers to the lenders, which pass on the risk to Fannie and Freddie. Because the interest-rate tisk concentrated at Fannie and Freddie is so large, their critics say American taxpayers carry a giant "contingent liability"....

Hmm, I seem to remember a thread where someone pointed out that Greenspan was touting the European way of doing mortgages-- adjustable rates. The math was pretty straight-forward, if Americans had had adjustable rate mortgages over the last couple of decades or so, they would have saved money. Like a lot of things, math doesn't tell the whole story.

Part of what might be happening here is that the government's current adminsitration would like to privatize the two mortgage behemoths and get rid of the risk they carry. One part of what might be needed to accomplish that would be to get rates up to the point that more Americans would start carrying the interest rate risk themselves instead of transferring it to Fannie and Freddie.

While I'm not a big Fannie/Freddie cheerleader (as most of you know) I would hate to see the government push so hard that they kill the goose that laid the golden egg. After all, even if money grew on trees, there would be a few wise birds who'd manage to get hold of most of it.

By improperly deferring those expenses (amortization), the regulator says, Fannie was able to meet-- to the penny-- the earnings threshold needed to allow maximum bonus payments for executives that year.
 
"The NewsHour" did a lengthy interview tonight on PBS.

You know it's being taken seriously when Jim Lehrer airs it.

L- in MN
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top