- Joined
- May 2, 2002
- Professional Status
- Certified General Appraiser
- State
- Arkansas
A loft is often counted in the GLA by Realtors and Assessors. It is hard to tell but in most Log homes, you can bank on it being more a "loft" than a full upper level, even if the walls are 8'....and to me, it seems like it sells that way.
Do you treat GLA to includes such lofts or finished attic rooms, or segregate them from the GLA?
I am doing a 1 sty log home, nice 12 yr old. I found one 12 yr , 16 yr and 25 yr old - all in similar shape. When I made adjustments in my sensitivity analysis, I came up with a $5 SF adjustment....not reasonable.
So I went back, did the age first, adjusted, and still a 'flat curve' indicated it could be $0, $5, $10... So I looked at my #2 comp- the only 2 story. The wall is not tall. It has do be that the 900 SF is a loft and so a call later, yep, it is a fairly low wall, so I deducted the SF out of the GLA, treated it as "other area" and adjusted my sale prices accordingly, and $35 per SF fell out of the sensitivity grid.... far more reasonable and by doing so solved the problem. Nevertheless, I cannot say that it isn't really GLA as fannie defines it...but it appears the market is defining such areas as "other"....and marking down accordingly.
Do you treat GLA to includes such lofts or finished attic rooms, or segregate them from the GLA?
I am doing a 1 sty log home, nice 12 yr old. I found one 12 yr , 16 yr and 25 yr old - all in similar shape. When I made adjustments in my sensitivity analysis, I came up with a $5 SF adjustment....not reasonable.
So I went back, did the age first, adjusted, and still a 'flat curve' indicated it could be $0, $5, $10... So I looked at my #2 comp- the only 2 story. The wall is not tall. It has do be that the 900 SF is a loft and so a call later, yep, it is a fairly low wall, so I deducted the SF out of the GLA, treated it as "other area" and adjusted my sale prices accordingly, and $35 per SF fell out of the sensitivity grid.... far more reasonable and by doing so solved the problem. Nevertheless, I cannot say that it isn't really GLA as fannie defines it...but it appears the market is defining such areas as "other"....and marking down accordingly.