In an effort of full discloser, I am not an appraiser. We recently had an appraisal done in conjunction with a refinance on our current home. When we received the appraisal, we extremely surprised by our appraised value. Our home has been appraised several times in the past 3 years, and this particular appraisal was at least $200,000 lower than any of the other appraisals. This has put our refinance in jeopardy.
While I am sure that customers being upset with an appraised value is nothing new, we have serious concerns about the validity of the underlying data. Here are just a few examples of errors contained in the appraisal:
1) Appraiser incorrectly listed the number of bedrooms and bathrooms in subject property. All bedrooms and bathrooms were photographed by appraiser and are above grade.
2) Subject property has approximately 100 square feet of finished basement. Although the appraiser measured this area and photographed it, it is not included in the valuation of subject property. All other properties are given a credit for their finished basement square footage.
3) The appraiser overstated the square footage of one of the comparable homes in the original appraisal by 1,800 square feet. He adjusted the square footage and the value of that comparable by $72,000. However, no adjustment was made to the value of the subject home to reflect this material error. Is it normal to adjust one comparable property due to a factual error and not adjust the subject property as well?
4) Appraiser makes comments such as, "There are no suitable comps within the past 6 months within subject's neighborhood so I was forced to consider sales outside of this time frame." There were at least 10 homes that sold within this time period in the neighborhood (as defined by the appraiser), but the appraiser has refused to consider those and won't give a reason. He still has that language included in the appraisal despite being provided with the numerous examples to the contrary.
5) As in #4, he states that he was unable to find any comparable homes within 25% GLA of subject property so he was forced to consider homes outside of that. One home was 60% GLA of the subject property. Once again, there are homes that meet that criteria in the neighborhood as defined by the appraiser. Appraiser will not comment on why he won't consider those.
6) As with #4/5, the appraiser states that there are no homes within a 1 mile radius so he must expand the search area. There are plenty of comparable sales within the 1 mile radius. Appraiser will not comment on why he will not consider those.
7) Appraiser states that the highest sales value in the "neighborhood" is $849,000, but there have been recent sales of comparable homes as high as $1,600,000. Once again these sales occurred in the neighborhood as defined by the appraiser.
We are not asking the appraiser to pick new comps (we would obviously prefer that he pick comps that are within 25% GLA, less than 1 mile from our home, and the most recent sales... I just think that these are better comps, but in some ways that is neither here nor there), but he refuses to fix the factual errors. We obviously cannot ask for a certain value (I firmly believe that the appraised value is a 20%-30% error... aside from the market conditions in the area, all of our other appraisals have come in our expected range). Any advice from the other side? These material errors will cost us our refinancing, and our damages are not insignificant.
ETA - These series of errors in aggregate seem to violate Standards Rule 1-1 (c), which states "a series of errors, in the aggregate, affects the credibility of those results." I really don't want to pursue this route, but our hands are tied right now.
While I am sure that customers being upset with an appraised value is nothing new, we have serious concerns about the validity of the underlying data. Here are just a few examples of errors contained in the appraisal:
1) Appraiser incorrectly listed the number of bedrooms and bathrooms in subject property. All bedrooms and bathrooms were photographed by appraiser and are above grade.
2) Subject property has approximately 100 square feet of finished basement. Although the appraiser measured this area and photographed it, it is not included in the valuation of subject property. All other properties are given a credit for their finished basement square footage.
3) The appraiser overstated the square footage of one of the comparable homes in the original appraisal by 1,800 square feet. He adjusted the square footage and the value of that comparable by $72,000. However, no adjustment was made to the value of the subject home to reflect this material error. Is it normal to adjust one comparable property due to a factual error and not adjust the subject property as well?
4) Appraiser makes comments such as, "There are no suitable comps within the past 6 months within subject's neighborhood so I was forced to consider sales outside of this time frame." There were at least 10 homes that sold within this time period in the neighborhood (as defined by the appraiser), but the appraiser has refused to consider those and won't give a reason. He still has that language included in the appraisal despite being provided with the numerous examples to the contrary.
5) As in #4, he states that he was unable to find any comparable homes within 25% GLA of subject property so he was forced to consider homes outside of that. One home was 60% GLA of the subject property. Once again, there are homes that meet that criteria in the neighborhood as defined by the appraiser. Appraiser will not comment on why he won't consider those.
6) As with #4/5, the appraiser states that there are no homes within a 1 mile radius so he must expand the search area. There are plenty of comparable sales within the 1 mile radius. Appraiser will not comment on why he will not consider those.
7) Appraiser states that the highest sales value in the "neighborhood" is $849,000, but there have been recent sales of comparable homes as high as $1,600,000. Once again these sales occurred in the neighborhood as defined by the appraiser.
We are not asking the appraiser to pick new comps (we would obviously prefer that he pick comps that are within 25% GLA, less than 1 mile from our home, and the most recent sales... I just think that these are better comps, but in some ways that is neither here nor there), but he refuses to fix the factual errors. We obviously cannot ask for a certain value (I firmly believe that the appraised value is a 20%-30% error... aside from the market conditions in the area, all of our other appraisals have come in our expected range). Any advice from the other side? These material errors will cost us our refinancing, and our damages are not insignificant.
ETA - These series of errors in aggregate seem to violate Standards Rule 1-1 (c), which states "a series of errors, in the aggregate, affects the credibility of those results." I really don't want to pursue this route, but our hands are tied right now.
Last edited: