• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

Over-improvement Vs Superadequacy

Status
Not open for further replies.

Terrel L. Shields

Elite Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
May 2, 2002
Professional Status
Certified General Appraiser
State
Arkansas
Germane to a thread elsewhere, I think this was posted by someone whose name escapes me now, about 3 yr ago. The abandoned concept of an "environmental" obsolescence may have been a premature death. The reply is on top, the original below it

It is easy to see why many appraisers interpret these two words to mean the same thing. Here are the definitions of both words as presented in Real Estate Appraisal Terminology by Byrl N. Boyce of the former appraisal organization known as the Society of Real Estate Appraisers.

Overimprovement- An improvement which is not the most profitable for the site on which it is placed because of its excessive size or cost, and consequent inability to develop the maximum possible land value. May be temporary or permanent.
An overimprovement typically reflects environmental obsolescence, although a substantial market may exist for such property among a group which takes personal pride in owning the most expensive home in the block and is willing to pay a price commensurate with cost.

Superadequacy- A greater capacity or quality in a structure or one of its components than the prudent purchaser or owner would include or would pay for in the particular type of structure under current market conditions.

[Thus] an over-improvement would be external (environmental?) obsolescence .... instead of a super-adequacy which suggests only a component or components of that improvements were excess to the market "norm."

I like that distinction, and I think it would answer the questions I asked weeks ago. I should have reflected an external obsolescence, because if the dwelling was in the appropriate neighborhood (the other side of county, lakeside, etc.) there would be no items super-adequate. I.e.- a $40,000 chandilier is super-adequate in most markets, but a new home in the slums is an over-improvement.

Terrel
It seems like a minor point what you call the source of the excess, just so you recognize and account for the excess, but on the other hand words mean things and it is best to preserve the language. In my mind over-improvement relates to highest and best use. It has the connotation of a loss in value due to a lack of conformity or harmony with the neighborhood norm. The total property is above the neighborhood norm.
On the other hand, super adequate means an excess of something. A foundation that will support double the required load, fixtures whose quality far exceeds the standards required, over sized hvac capacity, excessive bath fixtures like his and her toilets side-by-side ( I still can’t figure that one out). , etc.
If you look at it this way, it is clear that two standards of measurement are involved. Over-improvement is a total property concept and super adequate is a value factor concept. One is a measure of a residual and the other the difference between the excess less the standard. It is macro vs micro. Or so it seems to me.

 
I think I ran into examples of both in an assignment I completed last fall. The subject was proposed construction of a manufactured house. The "community' was a former mobile home park in the Eastern Sierras but is now a PUD. All lots are about 1/4 acre. Upon inspection of the subject, they had started the foundation which consised of a slab with 2 foot pony walls. I asked the borrower what the deal is with the slab and he said he liked a clean crawlspace. This would be a superadequacy... right?

Of the sales comparables (which were limited to this one project becuase it is unique and all other sales were on parcels with a minimum lot size of 5 acres) one of the sales was a very lagrge triple wide of luxury quality. The only one in the project. Overimprovement... right?
 
I also like the distinction. I had never really thought of it that way before, although I have appraised in both situations. Really, I don't think it makes much difference to the bottom line, but using that distinction might make it a bit more clear what you are adjusting for.
 
This forum is an tremendous teaching tool. Thanks for posting that clip Terrel. :cool: I blocked, copied and pasted it into WP and then edited it a bit.

That will be Jacks' CE for the day! (It was a good refresher for me) :)

TB
 
Superadequacy is where replacement costs of Superadequate form exceeds the

physical definition of Highest and Best Use in some cases:

I remember a property which was commercial and residential in nature that legal

non-conforming - these uses are limited or unlimited remaining economic life.

Sometimes the improvements "create value" to the land in the form of "excess

capacity" ....

Market values with "superadequacy built-in" can exceed exceed replacement cost

by large margins - such is the case with Frank Lloyd Wright Homes? B)
 
Well, being a Society SRA from 1979, that's the way it's always been..for me anyway

Over-improvement is External Obsolescence.

Super adequacy is functional obsolescence...

Who changed it... :D :D

Ben
 
Thanks for pointing out the distinction Terrel. I've never heard anyone talk about the difference. Although I'm familiar with both terms, I didn't know what they meant as opposed to one another and was using them interchangeably. Now I know that. Thanks.
 
Whoever wrote the second part of Terrel's above quote is obviously a person of great wisdom and understanding. We whould all strive to be more like him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top