• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

Positive Financing Adjustments

Status
Not open for further replies.

xerou

Sophomore Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2011
Professional Status
Appraisal Management Company
What is the opinion of appraisers here? FNMA doesn't allow positive financing adjustments but several appraisers tend to make them for REO sales. From what I can gather the market has already made an adjustment to the sale. Some appraisers will try to get around it by making a separate line adjustment for REOs

Just trying to gain some perspective on it. Thanks!
 
Appraisers are usually adjusting for sale type, not financing on REO's. (re for stigma, market reaction paying less, or a cash sale in short marketing time etc)

Personally, I am with you to an extent...the lower price of REO's is the market speaking and so adjusting them up is kind of wiping out the market...why use them then...but some appraisers adjust them up for influence of the "undue stimulus" of seller to sell. I sometimes adjust them up, (more often for shorter marketing time or all cash vs financing, but not always. ) Other appraisrers have a set view that virtually no REO sale can represent market value and adjust virtually all of them up. Many heated debates on this on the REO use threads.
 
They don't?


Try going to ALLREGS and searching "condition of sale", and then read the definition of market value.


Example, the best comp you had was part of a divorce or a estate sale and the parties just wanted to get rid of the property. This is the perfect comp with no adjustments needed. The only issue is that it just sold and had a DOM of 5 day's. The appraiser calls up and discusses the sale with the agent. The appraiser does match paired analysis on prior past sales with similar issues and derives a adjustment of $15,000.


So a up-wards condition of sale adjustment was made for $15,000.


The same goes with REO sales. If the market is not being driven or set by REO properties, and there is a selling price difference between REO sales and traditional market sales.......make the adjustment.

Do not get confused with seller concessions...

This is why I hate AMCs. (not you) just the business. I have the license, I'm signing the report, not you. Just give out the orders and move on.
 
Last edited:
XI, 406.03: Adjustments to Comparable Sales Each comparable sale that is used in the sales comparison approach to value must be analyzed for differences and similarities between it and the property that is being appraised. The appraiser must base his or her analysis and any adjustments to the comparable sales on the market data for the particular neighborhood and for competing locations—not on predetermined or assumed dollar adjustments. If an appraiser's adjustments to comparable sales (or the reconciliation of the comparable sales) are based on unsupported assumptions or personal opinion that cannot be supported by market data, poor quality appraisals that could have a discriminatory effect may result.

Comparable sales must be adjusted to the subject property—except for sales and financing concessions, which are adjusted to the market at the time of sale. The appraiser must make appropriate adjustments for location, terms and conditions of sale, date of sale, and the physical characteristics of the properties. "Time" adjustments must be representative of the market and should be supported by the comparable sales whenever possible. The adjustments must reflect the time that elapsed between the contract date (or the date of the "meeting of the minds") for the comparable sale and the effective date of the appraisal for the subject property.

The subject property is the standard against which the comparable sales are evaluated and adjusted. Thus, if an item in the comparable property is superior to that in the subject property, a negative adjustment is required to make that item equal to that in the subject property. Conversely, if an item in the comparable property is inferior to that in the subject property, a positive adjustment is required to make that item equal to that in the subject property. If an item in a comparable property is equal to that in the subject property, no adjustment is required.

A.Quantitative sales comparison analysis. Most appraisal forms require the appraiser to use a quantitative sales comparison analysis in which he or she assigns a dollar value to reflect the market's reaction to any features of the comparable sales that differ from those of the subject property. The proper selection of comparable properties minimizes both the need for, and the size of, any dollar adjustments. However, when there are no similar or truly comparable sales for a particular property—because of the uniqueness of the property or other conditions—the appraiser must select comparable sales that represent the best indicators of value for the subject property and make adjustments to reflect the actions of typical purchasers in that market. Dollar adjustments must reflect the market's reaction to the difference in the properties, not necessarily the cost of the difference. Swimming pools, electronic air filters, intercom systems, elaborately finished basements, carpets, and other special features generally do not affect value to the extent of their cost.
We have established guidelines for the net and gross percentage adjustments that underwriters may rely on as a general indicator of whether a property should be used as a comparable sale. Generally, the dollar amount of the net adjustments for each comparable sale should not exceed 15% of the sales price of the comparable. When the adjustments exceed 15%, the appraiser must comment on the reasons for not using a more similar comparable. Further, the dollar amount of the gross adjustments for each comparable sale should not exceed 25% of the sales price of the comparable. The amount of the gross adjustment is determined by adding all individual adjustments without regard to the positive or negative adjustments. When the adjustments exceed 25%, the appraiser must comment on the reasons for not using a more similar comparable.
Individual adjustments that are excessively high should be explained by the appraiser and reviewed carefully by the lender's underwriter. In some circumstances, the use of comparables with higher-than-normal adjustments may be warranted, but the appraiser must satisfactorily justify his or her use of them.
The appraiser must research the market and select the most comparable sales that are available for the subject property, and then adjust them to reflect the reaction of the market to the differences (except for sales and financing concessions) between the comparable sales and the subject property, without regard for the percentage or amount of the dollar adjustments. If the appraiser's adjustments do not fall within our net and gross percentage adjustment guidelines, but the appraiser believes that the comparable sales used in the analysis are the best available, as well as the best indicators of value for the subject property, the appraiser simply has to provide an appropriate explanation. If the extent of the appraiser's adjustments to the comparable sales is great enough to indicate that the property may not conform to the general market area, the lender's underwriter must review the property carefully.
 
What is the opinion of appraisers here? FNMA doesn't allow positive financing adjustments but several appraisers tend to make them for REO sales. From what I can gather the market has already made an adjustment to the sale. Some appraisers will try to get around it by making a separate line adjustment for REOs

Just trying to gain some perspective on it. Thanks!

I would suggest you look up the order of adjustments. You will find it in the book I am SURE you have. It is called Appraising Residential Properties, Fourth Edition. It is published by the Appraisal Institute. Any appraiser worth anything has this book or its equivalent in their office and if you are running a professional AMC you would also have this book and would have read it and understand it.
 
Fannie does not allow positive CONCESSION adjustments ... conditions of sale is a totally different animal.
 
Do not get the two mixed up.

We cannot let the FORM get in the way of a crediable report AND the forms have been updated with REO in the sales grid.... Square in the round whole comes to mind.

Sales or Financing Concessions
For in-depth discussion of sales or financing concessions, see B3-4.1-02, Interested Party Contributions (IPCs) (04/30/2010).
The table below describes lender evaluation requirements for sales or financing concessions.
Evaluating Sales or Financing Concessions
The dollar amount of sales or financing concessions paid by the seller must be reported for the comparable sales if the information is reasonably available.
Appraisers must provide the sales and financing concession information that was available and verified for the comparable sales.
If information is not available because of legal restrictions or other disclosure-related problems, the appraiser must explain why the information is not available.
Note: Fannie Mae will not accept an explanation that indicates that the appraiser did not make an effort to verify the information.
If the appraisal report form does not provide enough space to discuss this information, the appraiser must make an adjustment for the concessions on the form and include an explanation in an addendum to the appraisal report.

When a quantitative sales comparison analysis is used, the amount of the negative dollar adjustment for each comparable with sales or financing concessions should be equal to any increase in the purchase price of the comparable that the appraiser determines to be attributable to the concessions.
Adjustments based on dollar-for-dollar deductions that are equal to the cost of the concessions to the seller as a strict cash equivalency approach would dictate are not appropriate.
Adjustments must reflect the difference between what the comparables actually sold for with the sales concessions and what they would have sold for without the concessions so that the dollar amount of the adjustments will approximate the reaction of the market to the concessions.
Positive adjustments for sales or financing concessions are not acceptable.
For example, if local common practice or law results in virtually all of the property sellers in the market area paying a 1% loan origination fee for the purchaser, and a property seller in that market did not pay any loan fees or concessions for the purchaser, the sale would be considered as a cash equivalent sale in that market.

The appraiser must recognize comparable sales that sold for all cash or with cash equivalent financing and use them as comparable sales if they are the best indicators of value for the subject property.
Such sales also can be useful to the appraiser in determining those costs that are normally paid by sellers as the result of common practice or law in the market area.


Sales or financing data for comparable sales are generally available. Sales or financing data should be obtained from parties associated with the comparable transaction, such as the broker, buyer or seller, or a reliable data source. The need to make negative dollar adjustments for sales and financing concessions and the amount of the adjustments to the comparable sales are not based on how typical the concessions might be for a segment of the market area; large sales concessions can be relatively typical in a particular segment of the market and still result in sale prices that reflect more than value of the real estate.
 
the lower price of REO's is the market speaking and so adjusting them up is kind of wiping out the market...why use them then.

It is the market speaking, saying that's what they will pay for a distressed, as-is, vacant, special deed REO sale that has undue stimulus to sell. It is also the market speaking that they are not equally desireable and should be adjusted. Why use them? Because they may be the most similar overall when comparing the physical structure, land, view, etc.
 
Last edited:
Fannie does not allow positive CONCESSION adjustments ... conditions of sale is a totally different animal.


+1

Fannie Mae Selling Guide, B4-1.4-18

Positive adjustments for sales or financing concessions are not acceptable.
 
xerou-

Unrelated to your question, but related to your status (working for an AMC), I appreciate you coming to this forum to ask your questions (this is the 2nd post of yours that I've seen).

I wish more AMC entities would post their questions on this forum to get general appraiser feedback.

As I'm sure you've figured out, there is not a lot of love for AMCs on this forum or with many appraisers in general (and for good reason... not personally linked to you). But it can be a great resource for you and, ideally, it will provide you with information so you can perform your function better and maybe pass on some worthwhile information to those you work with.

Technical questions like this one you ask can almost always be referenced to a source. My advice on questions like these is to go to the source cited; the two most regularly cited sources we residential appraisers use are USPAP and the Fannie Selling Guide. It won't take long for you to become familiar with those two authorities if you research the citations that are provided in regard to your question.
Other questions are not always black/white, so you'll get different opinions. And, sometimes, there is no one-right-answer. Sometimes the answer is, "its a judgment call"; for both you and the appraiser. These are always the toughest ones (IMO).

Thanks again for seeking out appraiser opinions on appraisal matters.

Good luck!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top