TruJa
Junior Member
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2019
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- Idaho
I'm working on a conventional refinance for a home with an (illegal/unpermitted) ADU. The primary home has a lease for ~$2400, and the ADU has a lease for ~$850. It is an unpermitted "ADU". It is also not legal in the sense that local code requires some form of owner occupancy for an ADU to qualify as an ADU. I'm not concerned about how to handle an illegal ADU in the sales comparison approach. I'm more interested in the Income Approach requirements for Fannie. In the selling guide Chapter B2-3-04 indicates that, "A borrower must qualify for the mortgage without considering any rental income from the ADU." Rental comps with an ADU are not comparable because almost any that I can find are short-term rentals with "projected" monthly rental income instead of comparable long term rentals.
I guess my question is, how to handle this appropriately on a 1007? Should I exclude the rental income for the illegal ADU? If the market value per HBU must be a legal use, and the only legal use for this as an ADU would be if one of these units is occupied by an owner, then by definition the market value could only accept rental income from one of these units? I was up late last night reviewing a bad report, so maybe I'm just looking for an easy way to handle this.... but I want to be right too.
I guess my question is, how to handle this appropriately on a 1007? Should I exclude the rental income for the illegal ADU? If the market value per HBU must be a legal use, and the only legal use for this as an ADU would be if one of these units is occupied by an owner, then by definition the market value could only accept rental income from one of these units? I was up late last night reviewing a bad report, so maybe I'm just looking for an easy way to handle this.... but I want to be right too.