seekingAppAdvice
Freshman Member
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2026
- Professional Status
- General Public
- State
- New York
Hypothetical: An appraiser is retained by a bank to appraise a residential property for a construction loan. During that lending assignment, the appraiser obtains a copy of the borrower's signed construction contract from the bank (provided as part of the loan file) because there was no house yet built to actually appraise (it was a construction loan). The appraiser completes the bank assignment and gets paid.
A year or two later, the local municipality happens to hire the same appraiser to appraise the property on their behalf in a property tax dispute the owner filed. The appraiser takes the construction contract from the old work file, uses it again in the new appraisal, and gives it to the municipality for use against the homeowner in the property tax dispute.
The borrower/property owner allegedly never authorized the appraiser to share the contract or the information in it with anyone and the contract wasn't available anywhere else.
Bueno or no bueno?
A year or two later, the local municipality happens to hire the same appraiser to appraise the property on their behalf in a property tax dispute the owner filed. The appraiser takes the construction contract from the old work file, uses it again in the new appraisal, and gives it to the municipality for use against the homeowner in the property tax dispute.
The borrower/property owner allegedly never authorized the appraiser to share the contract or the information in it with anyone and the contract wasn't available anywhere else.
Bueno or no bueno?
Last edited:
