In my markets I can't compare this three months to the prior three months because it would give false readings. Real estate is as much affected by the seasons as it is by the trends. I do year-to-date data (or 1/4 over 1/4 if there is enough data) and year over year data. Below is a typical example of my market comments. Forgive all the dashes, I couldn't get the data to set apart nicely on the forum.
I just read that Salt Lake is one of the 13 strongest markets in the nation, BTW.
Market Conditions Continued:
Interest rates remain low and financing is typically conventional or FHA with the seller often paying buyer closing costs as an incentive. Gift programs for downpayment are not unusual. VA financing is also not uncommon.
Market conclusions reached on the first page of the report were determined using the data below which came directly from the local MLS as of the effective date of this report.
The search for data included two sets of criteria, the first of which is all residential property sales, active and pending, inside the subject project, Symmes Grove. These findings are reported below as the top two rows of information and reflect a year over year comparison. Also, year-to-date data was compiled by expanding the market search to include all residential properties between latitudes 27.82184613625773 and 27.85774511938376 and longitudes -82.34690666198729 and -82.3021721191406, more loosely described as that area south of Gibsonton Dr and Boyette Rd, west of McMullen Rd, north of Rhodine Rd and east of I-75, that were built from 2000 to 2008 and are between 1,550sf and 2,350sf. This second data search is shown as the second set of data below. The third set is the number of active and pending sales in the subject project.
Dates of Sale----------#Sales-----Avg GLA-----Avg Price-----$/SF-----Median Value-----Avg DOM
05/08/2006 - 05/08/2007-----13-----1,483sf-----$198,877-----$136.99-----$200,500-----75
05/08/2007 - 05/08/2008-----4-----1,428sf-----$172,400-----$122.85-----$171,450-----71
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
01/01/2007 - 05/08/2007-----44-----1,922sf-----$235,883-----$123.10-----$235,678-----131
01/01/2008 - 05/08/2008-----26-----1,832sf-----$186,637-----$102.27-----$189,343-----134
The top set shows the year over year data for the subject project is a limited sample but it indicates a decline in median value of 14.48%. The year to date data for the surrounding market shows the median value drop at 19.66%.
Number Listed-----Avg GLA-----Avg List Price-----LP:SP Ratio-----Adjusted List Price-----Adj $/sf
8 Active Listings-----1,626sf-----$192,475---------------98%-----$188,626---------------$116.00
1 Pending Sale-----1,926sf-----$149,900---------------98%-----$146,902---------------$ 72.27
The active and pending sales in the subject project indicate that the market is continuing to decline. Out of the 9 active listings 3 of them have been on the market for 6 months or longer. This coupled with the fact that there were only 4 sales in the project over the prior 12 months, means that the market is in an oversupply.
Final estimation of the market decline rate per year was left to the comparable data and was supported by the data above at 15%. Days on market is estimated at under 6 months due to the average days on market still remaining under 5 months. The market is, however, considered in an oversupply.
Comments On Economic Depreciation:
Due to the economic conditions that have resulted in a slow down in the area growth rate, the builder's price to build on a per square foot basis, based on accepted cost manuals, is not being met by the typical buyer. This results in economic loss taken as economic depreciation in the cost approach at $10,000. The adjustment is not made in the sales comparison approach as it is already accounted for in the sale prices of the benchmarks used.
There is also economic loss specific to the subject as the result of it being bank owned. Bank ownership of a property is considered a stigma that has an effect on value. Based on the market data this is an additional external depreciation amount of $5,000, giving a lump sum adjustment for economic depreciation of $15,000 in the cost approach. The bank ownership adjustment of $5,000 is made in the sales comparison approach to units sold with a private owner.