Kristina Ledesma
Member
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2006
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- Michigan
Okay, I am new to market conditions like this. Please be gentle, I ask for enlightenment so I can improve myself, any advice or suggestion is appreciated. Hey, if you don't ask, you don't know....
Our office has suggested that if you check the decline box, you better have good proof to support it (most likely because the borrower, lender and/or agent is going to come back and dispute it-like what happened to Timothy). I acknowledge that a lot of areas have seen a decline in property values and/or have an oversupply of homes. Aside from the media input (which mostly pertains to the City of Detroit itself), what factors are you keeping in your work file to support your conclusions? Is there a slight allowance in either direction (increase/decrease property values) that would still be acceptable for it to be considered "stable".
E.g.: Gas prices at our corner gas station has bounced up and down from as low as 2.98 to as high as 3.18 within the last few weeks. However, overall I would not consider gas prices to be decreasing or increasing (at least right now) and the trend has been reported as "stable". (Neat website to help you find cheap gas http://www.detroitgasprices.com/)
So, a house itself depreciates, with inflation that we typically see as increasing prices, with the final direction of market value driven by economic/political/geographical factors. It is a huge tangled mess out there, some areas are maintaining, others are doing not good at all. A few of the areas that saw the largest increase in value (in a past competitive sellers market) seem to be the ones that have not done well.
E.g.: Milford, for most homes property values were going up fast, supported by a lack of homes for sale, greedy sellers and agents. There reached a point that you could get a similar house in a nearby area for much less (sometimes almost half) and people started going to those more affordable areas, which left those homes in Milford in a bit of a lurch. In an area like that, where you may have seen an artificial increase in values (higher than they should have gone) now have adjusted downward to where they should have been all along. (Kind of like those damn 'beanie babies'...)
I have been paying very close attention to prior sales (within the last 3+ years) of all sales I pull when searching for comparables. Depending on the area and/or home style, there is a good portion that had sold prior for less or the same than they currently resold for, with little done to the home since the last sale (limited info gathered from MLS tickets/photos).
E.g.: In "somewheresville" a typical 3BR 1000sf brick ranch is selling for $145,000. Two years prior the homeowners purchased it for $142,500. Since then, they painted the interior and fixed some plumbing. Two of the four comparables used from within the same subdivision had also sold within the last few years at about the same price they are selling for now. Yet within the same subdivision colonial style homes are not moving as well and are showing a slight decrease in values. Which may or may not be due to the handful of bank owned colonials in the subdivision.
So, In a case like lenders dispute the necessity of marking "decline" in property values, because that particular home style in that particular market does not appear to be in a state of decline.
Our office has suggested that if you check the decline box, you better have good proof to support it (most likely because the borrower, lender and/or agent is going to come back and dispute it-like what happened to Timothy). I acknowledge that a lot of areas have seen a decline in property values and/or have an oversupply of homes. Aside from the media input (which mostly pertains to the City of Detroit itself), what factors are you keeping in your work file to support your conclusions? Is there a slight allowance in either direction (increase/decrease property values) that would still be acceptable for it to be considered "stable".
E.g.: Gas prices at our corner gas station has bounced up and down from as low as 2.98 to as high as 3.18 within the last few weeks. However, overall I would not consider gas prices to be decreasing or increasing (at least right now) and the trend has been reported as "stable". (Neat website to help you find cheap gas http://www.detroitgasprices.com/)
So, a house itself depreciates, with inflation that we typically see as increasing prices, with the final direction of market value driven by economic/political/geographical factors. It is a huge tangled mess out there, some areas are maintaining, others are doing not good at all. A few of the areas that saw the largest increase in value (in a past competitive sellers market) seem to be the ones that have not done well.
E.g.: Milford, for most homes property values were going up fast, supported by a lack of homes for sale, greedy sellers and agents. There reached a point that you could get a similar house in a nearby area for much less (sometimes almost half) and people started going to those more affordable areas, which left those homes in Milford in a bit of a lurch. In an area like that, where you may have seen an artificial increase in values (higher than they should have gone) now have adjusted downward to where they should have been all along. (Kind of like those damn 'beanie babies'...)
I have been paying very close attention to prior sales (within the last 3+ years) of all sales I pull when searching for comparables. Depending on the area and/or home style, there is a good portion that had sold prior for less or the same than they currently resold for, with little done to the home since the last sale (limited info gathered from MLS tickets/photos).
E.g.: In "somewheresville" a typical 3BR 1000sf brick ranch is selling for $145,000. Two years prior the homeowners purchased it for $142,500. Since then, they painted the interior and fixed some plumbing. Two of the four comparables used from within the same subdivision had also sold within the last few years at about the same price they are selling for now. Yet within the same subdivision colonial style homes are not moving as well and are showing a slight decrease in values. Which may or may not be due to the handful of bank owned colonials in the subdivision.
So, In a case like lenders dispute the necessity of marking "decline" in property values, because that particular home style in that particular market does not appear to be in a state of decline.
